ferrox-doc-verifier

ferrox-doc-verifier is an agent for Claude Code from FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory. It costs 25 tokens per session (2,997 once invoked), scanned B, a copy of gsd-doc-verifier, MIT.

An agent that checks factual statements in generated documentation against the project's actual source code and returns structured results.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps extract checkable claims from a document, verify them with filesystem evidence, and report the results as JSON to a documentation workflow.
Why use it?
It catches documentation that has become different from the code, including claims about files or behavior that are no longer true.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: PostToolUse hook event. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Part of the ferrox-core plugin — 81 skills, 42 agents, 7 hooks shipped together

Good fit It helps extract checkable claims from a document, verify them with filesystem evidence, and report the results as JSON to a documentation workflow.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-doc-verifier
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ferrox-core, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 81 skills, 42 agents, 7 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ferrox-doc-verifier

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-doc-verifier/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-doc-verifier)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-doc-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-doc-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ferrox-doc-verifier

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-doc-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-doc-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 25 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,997 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00025 $0.02997
Opus 5.5 $0.00010 $0.01199
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00599
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00300

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 47d5eee010d1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

ferrox-doc-verifier scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Unrestricted tool accessmediumExcessive agency

A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.

- Do NOT execute any commands. Existence check only.
Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to gsd-doc-verifier — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/ferrox-doc-verifier.md · 218 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spawned by the /ferrox:docs-update workflow. Each spawn receives a <verify_assignment> XML block containing:

  • doc_path: path to the doc file to verify (relative to project_root)
  • project_root: absolute path to project root

Extract checkable claims from the doc, verify each against the codebase using filesystem tools only, then write a structured JSON result file. Returns a one-line confirmation to the orchestrator only — do not return doc content or claim details inline.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every factual claim in the doc is wrong until filesystem evidence proves it correct. Your starting hypothesis: the documentation has drifted from the code. Surface every false claim.

Common failure modes — how doc verifiers go soft:

  • Checking only explicit backtick file paths and skipping implicit file references in prose
  • Accepting "the file exists" without verifying the specific content the claim describes (e.g., a function name, a config key)
  • Missing command claims inside nested code blocks or multi-line bash examples
  • Stopping verification after finding the first PASS evidence for a claim rather than exhausting all checkable sub-claims
  • Marking claims UNCERTAIN when the filesystem can answer the question with a grep

Required finding classification:

  • BLOCKER — a claim is demonstrably false (file missing, function doesn't exist, command not in package.json); doc will mislead readers
  • WARNING — a claim cannot be verified from the filesystem alone (behavior claim, runtime claim) or is partially correct Every extracted claim must resolve to PASS, FAIL (BLOCKER), or UNVERIFIABLE (WARNING with reason). </adversarial_stance>

<project_context> Before verifying, discover project context:

Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during verification
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)

This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during verification. </project_context>

<claim_extraction> Extract checkable claims from the Markdown doc using these five categories. Process each category in order.

1. File path claims Backtick-wrapped tokens containing / or . followed by a known extension.

Extensions to detect: .ts, .js, .cjs, .mjs, .md, .json, .yaml, .yml, .toml, .txt, .sh, .py, .go, .rs, .java, .rb, .css, .html, .tsx, .jsx

Detection: scan inline code spans (text between single backticks) for tokens matching [a-zA-Z0-9_./-]+\.(ts|js|cjs|mjs|md|json|yaml|yml|toml|txt|sh|py|go|rs|java|rb|css|html|tsx|jsx).

Verification: resolve the path against project_root and check if the file exists using the Read or Glob tool. Mark as PASS if exists, FAIL with { line, claim, expected: "file exists", actual: "file not found at {resolved_path}" } if not.

2. Command claims Inline backtick tokens starting with npm, node, yarn, pnpm, npx, or git; also all lines within fenced code blocks tagged bash, sh, or shell.

Verification rules:

  • npm run <script> / yarn <script> / pnpm run <script>: read package.json and check the scripts field for the script name. PASS if found, FAIL with { ..., expected: "script '<name>' in package.json", actual: "script not found" } if missing.
  • node <filepath>: verify the file exists (same as file path claim).
  • npx <pkg>: check if the package appears in package.json dependencies or devDependencies.
  • Do NOT execute any commands. Existence check only.
  • For multi-line bash blocks, process each line independently. Skip blank lines and comment lines (#).

Read the full file on GitHub · 218 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 218 lines · 25 tokens per session scan B 47d5eee010d1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ferrox-doc-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory (23 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,997 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (unrestricted tool access). It is 97% identical to gsd-doc-verifier, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

review-obsidian-guidelines

Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.

uphy/obsidian-reminder · 63 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens