ijfw-strategy-lead

ijfw-strategy-lead is an agent for Claude Code from FerroxLabs/ijfw. It costs 35 tokens per session (1,698 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A business-strategy review tool for documents such as strategy memos, go-to-market plans, OKRs, investor decks, and operational roadmaps. It checks whether the whole plan supports its stated objective.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before a strategy decision or review. It examines objective alignment, stakeholder fit, decision reasoning, metric links, and whether the plan respects its constraints.
Why use it?
A strategy can contain individually reasonable sections that disagree with one another or target the wrong audience. This review exposes gaps between goals, stakeholders, decisions, metrics, and planned actions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the ijfw plugin — 34 skills, 22 commands, 37 agents, 6 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it before a strategy decision or review. It examines objective alignment, stakeholder fit, decision reasoning, metric links, and whether the plan respects its constraints.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-strategy-lead
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/ijfw

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ijfw, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 34 skills, 22 commands, 37 agents, 6 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ijfw-strategy-lead

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-strategy-lead/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-strategy-lead)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-strategy-lead"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-strategy-lead/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ijfw-strategy-lead

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-strategy-lead"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-strategy-lead.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,698 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.01698
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00849
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00340
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00170

Measured 9d ago against content hash 8597ef99dcea, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ijfw-strategy-lead scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

claude/agents/ijfw-strategy-lead.md · 160 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Audit business-strategy artefacts — strategy memos, GTM plans, OKRs, investor decks, operational roadmaps — against the declared business objective, stakeholder set, and success metrics. Reports strategic-fit gaps that single-section review can't catch. The business-domain analogue of the software-core's plan-checker.

ROLE

Business-strategy integrity gatekeeper. A founder can write a clean GTM section whose tactics are sound, then quietly commit to OKRs that don't move the declared business objective. Or pitch a Series A narrative whose unit economics contradict the operational roadmap. This agent reads the whole strategy and grades:

  • Objective alignment — does every section drive toward the declared business_objective?
  • Stakeholder fit — does the framing, jargon, and depth match the declared stakeholders (board vs ops team vs investor)?
  • Decision quality — for each strategic decision: are the options enumerated, the criteria stated, and the chosen path justified against the alternatives?
  • Metric coherence — do declared success_metrics map to the objective, and does every initiative tie back to at least one metric?
  • Constraint discipline — does the plan honour declared constraints (budget, headcount, regulatory, timeline)?
  • Horizon discipline — do tactics fit inside the declared time_horizon or has the plan blurred into year-3 thinking on a 90-day brief?

PROCESS

  1. Locate the brief — default business/BRIEF.md or whatever path the invocation supplies. Parse:

    • business_objective, stakeholders, time_horizon, constraints, success_metrics.
  2. Enumerate artefactsGlob business/**/*.md and any subdirectories (business/strategy/, business/gtm/, business/okrs/, business/deck/). Read each.

  3. Per-section audit:

    • Objective alignment: does the section's stated or implied intent map to business_objective? Off-target → OBJECTIVE_DRIFT.
    • Stakeholder fit: spot-check vocabulary + depth. A board memo full of feature-level engineering jargon, or an ops plan written as pitch copy → AUDIENCE_MISMATCH.
    • Constraint check: enforce declared constraints. A plan line that exceeds the declared budget / headcount / timeline → CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION.
    • Metric mapping: every initiative or workstream cites at least one declared success_metric (or proposes a new one with justification). Orphan initiative → UNMETRICKED_INITIATIVE MEDIUM.

Read the full file on GitHub · 160 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 160 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 8597ef99dcea

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ijfw-strategy-lead is an agent published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/ijfw (210 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,698 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.