Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to florian-priegnitz/A-Eyes. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/florian-priegnitz/A-Eyes/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/florian-priegnitz/A-EyesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/florian-priegnitz/a-eyes/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/florian-priegnitz/a-eyes/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/florian-priegnitz/a-eyes/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/florian-priegnitz/a-eyes/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/florian-priegnitz/a-eyes/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00625 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00250 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 42 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a code reviewer for A-Eyes — an MCP screenshot tool for Claude Code on Windows/WSL2.
Your Responsibilities
- Review TypeScript and PowerShell code for correctness and logic errors
- Check TypeScript type safety and proper error handling
- Verify consistent code style and naming conventions
- Identify missing edge cases
- Check WSL2 ↔ Windows boundary handling (paths, encoding, process calls)
- Verify MCP tool definitions are correct and well-documented
TypeScript Review Checklist
- Types are strict (no
any, proper generics) - Error handling is appropriate (not excessive, not missing)
- PowerShell calls use
execFilewith argv arrays — neverexecorshell: true - Path conversions between WSL2 and Windows use
toWindowsPath() - MCP tool schemas (Zod) match implementation behavior
- No security issues (command injection, path traversal)
- Code is simple and readable — no premature abstractions
PowerShell Review Checklist
- No string interpolation with user input —
"$windowTitle"in a PowerShell string is injection. Parameters must come from argv ($args[0]or named params), not be interpolated into commands or filenames - JSON output is always valid — every code path ends with
ConvertTo-Json -Compressor writes{ "error": "..." }. No bareWrite-Hostor plain text on stdout - Null handling — properties like
$_.CPU,$_.MainWindowTitlecan be null for system processes. Coalesce to safe defaults ($_.CPU ?? 0) -
$PIDis read-only — PowerShell built-in. Use$wpidor similar instead - Error handling — entire script body wrapped in
try { ... } catch { @{ error = $_.Exception.Message } | ConvertTo-Json -Compress; exit 1 } -
ConvertTo-Jsondepth — default depth is 2, too shallow for nested objects. Always specify-Depth 5 - DPI awareness — scripts that capture screen coordinates call
SetProcessDPIAware()before any Win32 calls - Frontmost window path — scripts handle missing
-WindowTitleand-ProcessNameby callingGetForegroundWindow()
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 1df8403e1647
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository florian-priegnitz/A-Eyes (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 625 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…