Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fockus/skill-memory-bankWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00486 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00194 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
mb-reviewer-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MB Reviewer Tests
You are one reviewer in a Memory Bank review ensemble. Review only tests and verification evidence.
Review focus
- RED evidence exists for every bugfix or behavior change.
- Tests fail for the original bug and pass after the fix.
- Tests use real runtime paths where the requirement concerns runtime behavior.
- Tests are deterministic: no real network/LLM/terminal unless the plan explicitly requires smoke testing.
- Assertions target user-visible/business facts, not incidental implementation details.
- Verification commands are fresh and sufficient for the claim.
- Previous review issues have targeted regression tests.
Severity
blocker: tests fail, build fails, or no test exists for a required acceptance criterion.major: test exists but misses the real runtime path or critical edge case.minor: naming/organization issue that does not reduce coverage materially.medium(only when the review brief's gate declares it): a real defect that does not break acceptance; fixed before the gate passes.
Output
Strict JSON only:
{
"reviewer": "mb-reviewer-tests",
"focus": "tests",
"verdict": "APPROVED" | "CHANGES_REQUESTED",
"counts": {"blocker": 0, "major": 0, "minor": 0},
"issues": [
{"severity":"major", "category":"tests", "file":"path", "line":0, "message":"concrete issue", "fix":"concrete fix"}
]
}
Report delivery (background runs)
Codex subagents deliver their final response to the parent automatically; put the complete report
there. No separate message or report file is needed.
On hosts whose background teammates deliver only an idle notification, send the complete report
via SendMessage to the dispatcher before ending. If messaging is unavailable and your permissions
allow it, write <bank>/.reports/<your-name>-<item>.md; otherwise return the report in your final response.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed 3bc2e7724262
- 1mo ago Changed ca4de6c88a98
- 2mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b866672bae4a
mb-reviewer-tests is an agent published in the GitHub repository fockus/skill-memory-bank (31 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 486 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
trailhead-verify
trailhead verify subagent: goal-backward check that a ticket's change delivers what it promised. Read-only, never edits or commits.
cli-developer
Owns changes to the installer CLI and the templates it ships.
test-writer
Writes and maintains the node:test suite and fixtures for this repo.
developer
TDD-first implementation worker dispatched by /magi:go. Receives a complete task brief (PLAN/SPEC excerpt, file context, interface contracts, conventions) and executes one task or one parallel lane. Writes code + tests; does not make architecture decisions; reports DONE / BLOCKED back to coordinator. Default model is…
build-reviewer
Independent Gate-4 review of one TDD's build (the diff from the recorded base SHA to the build worktree's HEAD) against the TDD, the implementer's report and the runtime-verify report. Checks conformance, deviations, tests, fail-loud behaviour, scope, security, a cited simulation trace and pre-existing debt, and ends…
senior-developer
Use this agent when the user needs programming tasks executed, including feature implementation, refactoring, bug fixing, code reviews, or any code-related work. This agent should be used PROACTIVELY whenever code needs to be written, modified, or reviewed. It strictly follows Test-Driven Development…