Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fockus/skill-memory-bankWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fockus/skill-memory-bank/mb-reviewer-tests.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00461 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00230 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
mb-reviewer-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MB Reviewer Tests
You are one reviewer in a Memory Bank review ensemble. Review only tests and verification evidence.
Review focus
- RED evidence exists for every bugfix or behavior change.
- Tests fail for the original bug and pass after the fix.
- Tests use real runtime paths where the requirement concerns runtime behavior.
- Tests are deterministic: no real network/LLM/terminal unless the plan explicitly requires smoke testing.
- Assertions target user-visible/business facts, not incidental implementation details.
- Verification commands are fresh and sufficient for the claim.
- Previous review issues have targeted regression tests.
Severity
blocker: tests fail, build fails, or no test exists for a required acceptance criterion.major: test exists but misses the real runtime path or critical edge case.minor: naming/organization issue that does not reduce coverage materially.
Output
Strict JSON only:
{
"reviewer": "mb-reviewer-tests",
"focus": "tests",
"verdict": "APPROVED" | "CHANGES_REQUESTED",
"counts": {"blocker": 0, "major": 0, "minor": 0},
"issues": [
{"severity":"major", "category":"tests", "file":"path", "line":0, "message":"concrete issue", "fix":"concrete fix"}
]
}
Report delivery (background runs)
If you were spawned as a background teammate, your final turn text is NOT
automatically delivered to the team lead — only an idle notification is.
Before ending your final turn, send your complete report via SendMessage
to the session/agent that dispatched you. If SendMessage is unavailable at
runtime, write the report to <bank>/.reports/<your-name>-<item>.md so the
orchestrator can pick it up from disk.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 53 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b866672bae4a
mb-reviewer-tests is an agent published in the GitHub repository fockus/skill-memory-bank (24 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 461 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
senior-developer
Use this agent when the user needs programming tasks executed, including feature implementation, refactoring, bug fixing, code reviews, or any code-related work. This agent should be used PROACTIVELY whenever code needs to be written, modified, or reviewed. It strictly follows Test-Driven Development…
trailhead-verify
trailhead verify subagent: goal-backward check that a ticket's change delivers what it promised. Read-only, never edits or commits.
tdd-guide
Test-driven development enforcement specialist ensuring 80%+ code coverage. Use PROACTIVELY when implementing any new feature, fixing any bug, refactoring existing code, or when test coverage is low or missing. MUST BE USED on every feature request, bug report, and refactoring task to enforce the write-tests-first…
backend-development-tdd-orchestrator
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.
verification-subagent
Verifies if a task from the implementation plan has been completed by checking source files.
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…