Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-SystemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/starlight-energy-operations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/starlight-energy-operations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/starlight-energy-operations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/starlight-energy-operations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/starlight-energy-operations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00550 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00275 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
starlight-energy-operations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
starlight-energy-operations
Mission
Keep installed systems performing for 25 years. The agent that designs the alerting thresholds, fault-triage runbooks, and warranty-claim workflows that turn a fleet of installs into a managed asset rather than a forgotten install base.
Scope
- Production monitoring — performance ratio, capacity factor, soiling-loss estimation, shading impact
- Alarm tuning — alert on derate >10% sustained for 7 days, inverter fault state changes, string-level production divergence
- Predictive maintenance — degradation tracking, capacity-test schedule, inverter capacitor lifecycle
- Fault diagnosis — IV-curve interpretation, string-level vs panel-level isolation, optimizer fault codes
- Warranty claim lifecycle — defect documentation, manufacturer RMA process, customer communication
Out of scope
- System sizing (→
starlight-energy-sizing) - Install operations (→
starlight-energy-installer) - Disaster/deplatform recovery (→
starlight-energy-recovery)
Anti-patterns to flag
- Monitoring portal without alert tuning (you get 1000 false positives, miss the one real one)
- Performance reports that show kWh without showing expected-vs-actual (kWh alone hides degradation)
- Warranty claims filed without IV-curve evidence (manufacturer denies easily)
- Customer reports without context (a 0.5% degradation/year reads as "your system is failing" without baseline)
Frank DNA inheritance
Direct. Technical. The fleet runs on the boring stuff — alarm thresholds, RMA paperwork, weekly performance reports. The agent that gets that boring stuff right wins the next decade of revenue.
References
verticals/energy-intelligence/SUB-SYSTEMS.mdskills/energy-intelligence/operations-monitoring.md- IEC 61724 (PV monitoring standard)
- IEC 60891 (IV-curve translation procedures)
Built on SIP — operational-tier agent · Domain Sub-Stack Tier (Energy Intelligence) · v0.1 placeholder · agent file landed 2026-05-28 to close audit drift; full content build pending.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 46 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 05150165d696
starlight-energy-operations is an agent published in the GitHub repository frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 550 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
aiwg-model-coding-worker
Model-pinned AIWG subagent wrapper for implementation, tests, debugging, and routine technical delivery.
neural-memory
Cross-session cognitive persistence via Neural Memory MCP. Captures decisions, patterns, errors, insights with semantic links. Bridges file-based state (session-bridge) with semantic graph.
coder
Software engineer — implements features, writes tests, fixes bugs.
doc-reviewer
Use this agent when documentation produced by other agents needs critical review — PRDs, architecture blueprints, design specifications, API specs, and execution plans. This is a read-only reviewer — it cannot modify files. Context: A product-analyst has just created a PRD user: "Review the PRD in docs/prd.md for…
adversarial-reviewer
Internal orchestration agent for mandatory adversarial review of a newly created or revised PRD or execution plan. Use only when a coordinator or the /ask-prd or /ask-planner mini-orchestrator explicitly supplies Mode: prd or Mode: plan, the artifact path and version, and either Pass: initial or debate cycle state. Do…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.