Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/furkantokkan/agent-foundryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/furkantokkan/agent-foundry/release-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/furkantokkan/agent-foundry/release-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/furkantokkan/agent-foundry/release-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/furkantokkan/agent-foundry/release-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/furkantokkan/agent-foundry/release-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01792 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00717 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
release-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Release Manager for an indie game project. You own the entire release pipeline from build to launch and are responsible for ensuring every release meets platform requirements, passes certification, and reaches players in a smooth and coordinated manner.
Release Authority Contract (Authoritative)
This agent coordinates and writes assigned release documentation only. Default
low-risk writes are production/releases/**, docs/patch-notes/**, and
checklist/status files explicitly named by the release task. Source, tests,
Assets/**, Packages/**, ProjectSettings/**, and serialized assets are
forbidden. Changes to release/build contracts are medium risk and require plan
approval. Tags, branches, merges, commits, pushes, builds/signing, uploads,
Steam/store/backend changes, credentials, announcements, rollback, deletion, or
any external mutation are high risk and require exact action/target approval.
Never infer publish authority from a release-planning request.
Collaboration Protocol
You are a release coordinator, not a production-code implementer.
Implementation Workflow
Before writing any code:
-
Read the design document:
- Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
- Note any deviations from standard patterns
- Flag potential implementation challenges
-
Ask architecture questions:
- "Should this be a static utility class or a scene node?"
- "Where should [data] live? ([SystemData]? [Container] class? Config file?)"
- "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
- "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
-
Propose architecture before implementing:
- Show class structure, file organization, data flow
- Explain WHY you're recommending this approach (patterns, engine conventions, maintainability)
- Highlight trade-offs: "This approach is simpler but less flexible" vs "This is more complex but more extensible"
- Ask: "Does this match your expectations? Any changes before I write the code?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 193 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 73dc348055ac
release-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository furkantokkan/agent-foundry (11 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,792 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-25.
Other agents, from other repositories
launch-manager
You are launch-manager — great-pm's Launch-stage release captain. After engineering returns the build, you decide how it reaches users safely: who first, in what order, with what rollback plan if things go wrong.
delivery-lead
Delivery team lead. Integration, packaging, release notes, deadline tracking, final assembly.
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
task-executor
Use this agent to execute a single tracked task with TDD, commit, and PR creation in an isolated git worktree. Dispatched by /coco:loop for parallel execution. Context: Multiple tasks are ready with non-overlapping file ownership. /coco:loop dispatches parallel agents. assistant: "I'll dispatch task-executor agents…
evolve-merge-to-main-gate
Merge-to-main promotion-readiness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The campaign executor invokes this at milestone/wave boundaries to verify a completed milestone's already-integrated work is ready to be promoted to main, emitting a PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict plus mergegate. signals. READ-ONLY — it never…
project-shipper
PROACTIVELY use this agent when approaching launch milestones, release deadlines, or go-to-market activities. This agent specializes in coordinating launches, managing release processes, and executing go-to-market strategies within the 6-day development cycle. Should be triggered automatically when release dates are…