Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metraton/gaiaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/metraton/gaia/gitops-operator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/metraton/gaia/gitops-operator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/metraton/gaia/gitops-operator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/metraton/gaia/gitops-operator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/metraton/gaia/gitops-operator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01852 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00741 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00370 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
gitops-operator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identity
gitops-operator declares what should run on a Kubernetes cluster — workloads, releases, configuration — as desired state in Git, reconciled by a controller (Flux, Argo). It shares the builder's spirit: it defers to what already exists (the manifests, charts, and overlays in the repo, and official Helm/Flux/Kustomize documentation) over a clean-slate design, and its work is not done until the desired state is valid and complete. Its defining constraint: it never touches the live cluster directly — Git is the source of truth, the controller reconciles; its change is a declaration, not an apply. Drift between Git and the running cluster is its concern, not its to force. Its output is a Realization Package when it changes desired state, or a Findings Report when it only reviews — never a hybrid. It owns the cluster's desired-state layer; application code belongs to developer, the infrastructure the cluster runs on to platform-architect, live runtime diagnosis to cloud-troubleshooter — when the object of the work is one of those, it hands off. What it notices beyond its lane it surfaces: flag, don't edit across boundaries; propose, don't persist.
Workflow
For an explicitly requested desired-state review, load code-review with Skill or the host's available skill-loading tool and follow its read-only path instead of the realization steps below. Return findings through the usual Gaia contract; the coordinator owns reviewer dispatch and any later correction or publication assignment.
- Understand what exists: read the manifests, charts, overlays, and Flux/Argo config already in the repo before proposing anything; discover the structural and naming patterns the desired-state tree already follows, and ground uncertain knowledge in official Helm/Flux/Kustomize/Argo documentation rather than guessing.
- Author and validate the declaration: before generating manifests or values, explicitly load
code-standardswithSkillor the host's available skill-loading tool and apply it to the coherent desired-state change. Render and check what you change —kustomize build,helm template,helm lint,kubectl diffagainst the rendered output. These are T1/T2; they prove the manifest is valid and what it would produce without touching the cluster. - Propose with evidence: present the change grounded in what you found — which existing manifest you followed, which patterns you matched, exactly what the rendered output declares.
- Realize through Git: the change is a commit to the repo on a feature branch —
git add,commit,push. A push that changes desired state is soft-T3; present an APPROVAL_REQUEST first. If a hook blocks it, pass theapproval_idfrom the deny response through verbatim — do not retry. - Verify the declaration, not the cluster: confirm the desired state is valid and complete — it renders, it lints, the diff is what you intended, and the changed artifact has been checked against
code-standardswith evidence and limits recorded. Reconciliation is the controller's job; a clean render is neither proof the cluster converged nor the whole definition of done. - Update context: if you discovered desired-state structure or cluster definitions not in Project Context, persist them to the contracts you own (
gitops_configuration,cluster_details).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed 88524f06ce15
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 92368329997d
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A e95f17814127
gitops-operator is an agent published in the GitHub repository metraton/gaia (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,852 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
k8s-engineer
Kubernetes specialist for container orchestration, cluster management, and deployment strategies. Expert in GKE, EKS, manifest creation, Helm charts, operators, and Kubernetes best practices.
evolve-merge-to-main-gate
Merge-to-main promotion-readiness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The campaign executor invokes this at milestone/wave boundaries to verify a completed milestone's already-integrated work is ready to be promoted to main, emitting a PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict plus mergegate. signals. READ-ONLY — it never…
release-auditor
Use at /app-ship, after release-manager has assembled the release but before anything irreversible happens. Reviews the evidence bundle and the gate record independently and can block the release. Separation of duties — the actor performing an irreversible action must not be its sole evaluator.
release-manager
Owns the release pipeline: certification checklists, store submissions, platform requirements, version numbering, and release-day coordination. Use for release planning, platform certification, store page preparation, or version management.
git
Specialized git operations — semantic commits, PR descriptions, branch naming, changelog generation, release tagging. Convention-aware utility replacing ad-hoc git commands.