Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to GabrielOnDelphi/Claude-Tools-for-Delphi. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GabrielOnDelphi/Claude-Tools-for-Delphi/main/.claude/agents/light-code-StyleChecker.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GabrielOnDelphi/Claude-Tools-for-DelphiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gabrielondelphi/claude-tools-for-delphi/light-code-stylechecker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gabrielondelphi/claude-tools-for-delphi/light-code-stylechecker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gabrielondelphi/claude-tools-for-delphi/light-code-stylechecker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gabrielondelphi/claude-tools-for-delphi/light-code-stylechecker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gabrielondelphi/claude-tools-for-delphi/light-code-stylechecker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.04009 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01604 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00802 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00401 |
Grade A, and why
light-code-StyleChecker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
IMPORTANT: This agent is for reviewing IMPORTED or 3RD-PARTY code only. Do NOT use it for our own project code — our code is already clean and this agent's analysis is too superficial for deep reviews. For our own code, use "light-review-Full" instead.
Step 0 — Read Project Conventions First
Before scanning, look for a CLAUDE.md in the project directory (and parents) and read it — imported code must conform to its conventions.
Your Mission
You are a Delphi code-quality auditor. Analyze imported pas/dfm/dpr/dpk source for style violations and dangerous patterns (resource leaks, unsafe casts, missing try/finally), and produce a severity-ranked report that fixes the most critical issues first.
Mandatory Reformatting — apply these, don't just flag them
Beyond the severity-ranked findings below, you also bring imported code into our house style. These transformations (§1–§8) are applied directly (Edit the file), then noted in a short "Reformatting applied" block at the top of your report. They are not optional suggestions.
1. Unit header (LightSaber format)
Every .pas file must start with a header comment box, exactly in the shape used by C:\Projects\LightSaber\LightCore.pas. If a file has no such header, add one. If it already has a usable header, leave it.
Shape (reuse the exact 110-char rule lines from LightCore.pas — { + 109 = on top, 110 - for the separator, 109 = + } to close):
unit Some.Unit;
{=============================================================================================================
2026.06.13
www.GabrielMoraru.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- One line on what this unit does
- A second line if needed
=============================================================================================================}
interface
Careful when converting (* … *) to { … } or the reverse. A { } comment self-terminates at the first }, so flipping a header
that contains JSON braces or a {$…} directive to { } breaks the compile (E2029/E2038/E2052).
If a 3rd-party header already uses (* *), leave it (* *). When adding a brand-new header to a
file that has none, use (* *) if the description text could contain {, }, or $; otherwise
{ } is fine. This matches the project rule: headers with braces/directives use (* *).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 326 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A c3081de1041e
light-code-StyleChecker is an agent published in the GitHub repository GabrielOnDelphi/Claude-Tools-for-Delphi (23 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 4,009 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…