Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekatron/jerryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/wt-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/wt-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekatron/jerry/wt-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geekatron/jerry/wt-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geekatron/jerry/wt-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.06166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.03083 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.01233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00617 |
Grade A, and why
wt-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 648 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 180457b300f0
wt-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository geekatron/jerry (32 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 6,166 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
plan-sync
Synchronizes downstream task specs after implementation. Spawned by flow-next-work once per resolved wave. Do not invoke directly.
ijfw-extract-learnings
Use after a phase or milestone completes to mine artifacts for decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises that should feed forward.
ac-claim-verifier
PRFlow implement's Phase 3.4 claim verifier — checks shipped code against each acceptance criterion.
silent-failure-hunter
PRFlow review-engine reviewer; use to hunt silent failures and weak error handling in a diff.
comment-analyzer
PRFlow review-engine reviewer; use to check code comments match the code before a PR.
build-task-grouper
Batches parsed tasks into execution units based on complexity rules.