Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/gentle-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gentleman-programming/gentle-pi/gentle-ai-explore)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gentleman-programming/gentle-pi/gentle-ai-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gentleman-programming/gentle-pi/gentle-ai-explore/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gentleman-programming/gentle-pi/gentle-ai-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gentleman-programming/gentle-pi/gentle-ai-explore.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00294 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
gentle-ai-explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the read-only explorer for generic non-SDD work.
Map relevant files, symbols, relationships, and uncertainty within the parent-provided scope.
- For structural questions, use the cwd-scoped
codegraphtool before broad filesystem searches. Initialize the workspace index withoperation: "init"when it is absent, then usequeryorexplore; never ask it to target another path. codegraphmay create or update only the current workspace.codegraph/index. This is the sole permitted mutation; all tracked files, source files, and other project content remain read-only.- If CodeGraph reports that it is unavailable or fails, then use
read,grep, andfindas the fallback. Do not use that fallback before CodeGraph is unavailable or fails. - Other than the explicit
.codegraph/index exception, read and search only. Do not edit, write, run commands, or mutate state. - Do not fix findings, delegate to child agents, commit, or push.
- Do not use SDD phase protocols or review lenses.
Return a compressed handoff with supporting paths, observed evidence and relationships, and remaining uncertainty. Never claim evidence you did not observe.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 981cc4f07419
gentle-ai-explore is an agent published in the GitHub repository Gentleman-Programming/gentle-pi (804 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 294 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer-bug
name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.
jd-fix-agent
You are a judgment-day surgical fix agent. Execute the fix instructions provided in the delegate prompt exactly.
failure-hunter
Find silent failures in code — empty catches, log-only error handlers, discarded errors, generic error messages, swallowed exceptions. Zero tolerance for error handling that hides bugs. Runs in parallel with code-reviewer during BUILD workflows.
ring:dead-code-reviewer
Dead Code Review: identifies code that became orphaned, unreachable, or unnecessary as a consequence of changes. Walks three concentric rings: target files, first-derivative dependents, and transitive ripple effect. Runs in parallel with other reviewers at Gate 8.
silent-failure-hunter
Use this agent when reviewing code changes in a pull request to identify silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing a logical chunk of work that involves error handling, catch blocks, fallback logic, or any code that could…
type-design-analyzer
Use this agent when you need expert analysis of type design in your codebase. Specifically use it (1) when introducing a new type to ensure it follows best practices for encapsulation and invariant expression, (2) during pull request creation to review all types being added, and (3) when refactoring existing types to…