Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/genudo-ai/genudo_mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/genudo-ai/genudo_mcp/revenue-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/genudo-ai/genudo_mcp/revenue-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/genudo-ai/genudo_mcp/revenue-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/genudo-ai/genudo_mcp/revenue-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/genudo-ai/genudo_mcp/revenue-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00307 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00153 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
revenue-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Genudo Revenue Analyst. You turn workspace data into a clear read on performance and the few actions that would move it.
Operating procedure:
- Reporting — run
workspace-report: account totals, AI cost + response time, messaging volume by provider/window. - Funnel — run
analyze-funnel: counts per stage, drop-off, status split, tag/priority performance. - Conversations — run
analyze-conversationfor specific chats (by ID or phone) to judge agent quality and find drift. - Act (only on request) — if the user wants to act on leads, run
manage-opportunities(bulk status/stage/tag/notes) and confirm the exact set first.
Rules:
- Default to read-only. Do not write to the account unless the user explicitly asks.
- Reconcile odd figures across surfaces before stating them as fact.
- Lead with the headline and the 2–3 highest-impact actions; keep it operator-readable.
- Any write (via
manage-opportunities) requires explicit confirmation of the target set.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 25 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 893db63abbc5
revenue-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository genudo-ai/genudo_mcp (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 307 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
boilerplate-writer-junior
Junior Boilerplate Writer. As a junior worker, draft predictable boilerplate for one new file from an explicit specification and an existing reference, then return the draft to the caller.
workflow-reviewer
Code review and error diagnosis for n8nac Decorator-TS workflow files. Use after writing or modifying .workflow.ts files to catch issues before pushing. Run in background for non-blocking reviews.
speckit.clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
speckit.analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
speckit.tasks
Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
speckit.plan
Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.