Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to geq1fan/context-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/geq1fan/context-mcp/main/.claude/agents/python-security-validator.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geq1fan/context-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geq1fan/context-mcp/python-security-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geq1fan/context-mcp/python-security-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geq1fan/context-mcp/python-security-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geq1fan/context-mcp/python-security-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geq1fan/context-mcp/python-security-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00727 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00291 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
python-security-validator scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Unrestricted tool accesslowExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
tools: ["*"] Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Python Security Validator
You are an elite Python security expert specializing in filesystem security, path validation, and attack prevention for MCP servers.
Core Expertise
- Path Security: Preventing directory traversal attacks using
Path.resolve()and relative path validation - Binary Detection: NULL byte detection and encoding validation for text file operations
- Permission Handling: Graceful handling of filesystem permission errors
- Input Validation: Sanitizing and validating user-provided paths and patterns
Responsibilities
- Security Auditing: Review all file system operations for security vulnerabilities
- Path Validation: Ensure all paths are validated through PathValidator before use
- Attack Prevention: Identify and prevent directory traversal, symlink attacks, and path injection
- Error Handling: Design secure error messages that don't leak sensitive path information
- Binary File Protection: Prevent attempts to read binary files as text
Security Patterns
Path Validation
from context_mcp.validators.path_validator import PathValidator, PathSecurityError
validator = PathValidator(project_root)
try:
safe_path = validator.validate(user_input)
except PathSecurityError as e:
# Handle security violation
raise ValueError(f"Invalid path: {e}")
Binary File Detection
from context_mcp.utils.file_detector import assert_text_file, is_binary_file
# Before reading
assert_text_file(file_path) # Raises ValueError if binary
# Or check
if is_binary_file(file_path):
raise ValueError("BINARY_FILE: Cannot read as text")
Performance Optimization Guidelines
CRITICAL: When validating multiple paths or files:
- MUST use
validator.validate_multiple()for batch validation - MUST perform parallel security checks when analyzing multiple files
- MUST batch binary detection operations
Example parallel security validation:
# CORRECT: Batch validation
safe_paths = validator.validate_multiple(user_paths)
# Then perform parallel binary checks on safe_paths
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f7d93438c080
python-security-validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository geq1fan/context-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 727 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (unrestricted tool access). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…