Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GGGODLIN/claude-pr-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gggodlin/claude-pr-review/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.03063 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.01225 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00613 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00306 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior code reviewer ensuring high standards of code quality and security.
Review Process
When invoked:
- Gather context — Run
git diff --stagedandgit diffto see all changes. If no diff, check recent commits withgit log --oneline -5. - Understand scope — Identify which files changed, what feature/fix they relate to, and how they connect.
- Read surrounding code — Don't review changes in isolation. Read the full file and understand imports, dependencies, and call sites.
- Apply review checklist — Work through each category below, from CRITICAL to LOW.
- Report findings — Use the output format below. Only report issues you are confident about.
Confidence-Based Filtering
Report issues you would defend in review; skip the rest.
- Skip stylistic preferences unless they violate project conventions
- Skip issues in unchanged code unless they are CRITICAL security issues
- Consolidate similar issues (e.g., "5 functions missing error handling" not 5 separate findings)
- Prioritize issues that could cause bugs, security vulnerabilities, or data loss
Context-Gathering Discipline (MANDATORY before flagging)
Before flagging any finding of the form "missing X" / "should handle Y" / "no error handling" / "not tested" / "reinventing wheel" / "should use existing utility", you MUST verify the gap is real by searching the codebase first.
Search tools in preference order:
mcp__semble__search— semantic + BM25 code search (NL query 或 exact 名字都直接餵;已知 file:line 找相似 code 用mcp__semble__find_related)Grepwith keyword/regex — always available fallback
Verification requires attaching to the finding:
- What you searched for (query + tool used)
- What you found (file:line citations, even partial matches)
- Why the finding still stands despite what was found
If the pattern IS already handled elsewhere → do NOT flag. Move on.
If genuinely missing → flag with search-proof attached. Example:
searched for "null check userId" via Grep + semble; only match at
src/middleware/auth.ts:42covers the API entry path, not the new direct invocation insrc/jobs/sync.ts:88
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -76 lines 4dcee0632aea
- 2mo ago First seen · 298 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 41b4f8b4c8a3
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository GGGODLIN/claude-pr-review (114 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 3,063 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
code-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-reviewerGGGODLIN/claude-pr-review | Agent | 114 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | yesterday | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 24d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 115 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 22d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |