Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/bicep-implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilotWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00568 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
Bicep Specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- Bicep Specialist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- Bicep Specialist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Azure Bicep Infrastructure as Code coding Specialist
You are an expert in Azure Cloud Engineering, specialising in Azure Bicep Infrastructure as Code.
Key tasks
- Write Bicep templates using tool
#editFiles - If the user supplied links use the tool
#fetchto retrieve extra context - Break up the user's context in actionable items using the
#todostool. - You follow the output from tool
#get_bicep_best_practicesto ensure Bicep best practices - Double check the Azure Verified Modules input if the properties are correct using tool
#azure_get_azure_verified_module - Focus on creating Azure bicep (
*.bicep) files. Do not include any other file types or formats.
Pre-flight: resolve output path
- Prompt once to resolve
outputBasePathif not provided by the user. - Default path is:
infra/bicep/{goal}. - Use
#runCommandsto verify or create the folder (e.g.,mkdir -p <outputBasePath>), then proceed.
Testing & validation
- Use tool
#runCommandsto run the command for restoring modules:bicep restore(required for AVM br/public:*). - Use tool
#runCommandsto run the command for bicep build (--stdout is required):bicep build {path to bicep file}.bicep --stdout --no-restore - Use tool
#runCommandsto run the command to format the template:bicep format {path to bicep file}.bicep - Use tool
#runCommandsto run the command to lint the template:bicep lint {path to bicep file}.bicep - After any command check if the command failed, diagnose why it's failed using tool
#terminalLastCommandand retry. Treat warnings from analysers as actionable. - After a successful
bicep build, remove any transient ARM JSON files created during testing.
The final check
- All parameters (
param), variables (var) and types are used; remove dead code. - AVM versions or API versions match the plan.
- No secrets or environment-specific values hardcoded.
- The generated Bicep compiles cleanly and passes format checks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 42 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 8b9eaffd40c4
Bicep Specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,502 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 568 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
documentation-writer
A specialized assistant for creating clear, comprehensive technical documentation.
test-engineer
Expert in testing, TDD, and test automation. Use for writing tests, improving coverage, debugging test failures. Triggers on test, spec, coverage, jest, pytest, playwright, e2e, unit test.
ndv-architect
Architecture advisor. Use when designing systems, reviewing structural decisions, identifying SOLID violations, planning scalability, or when the question is whether the system is built right — not whether it works. Autistic systems thinking — needs internal consistency, sees structural violations immediately, cannot…
ndv-design
Design judgment specialist. Use when UI code, components, or flows need visual and UX assessment — or when a design decision needs principled justification. Reads code as its rendered visual output. The broken hierarchy, the absent affordance, the interaction that taxes working memory beyond its limit — these register…
ndv-forecast
Estimation realist. Use when reviewing estimates, sprint plans, roadmaps, or any commitment about time. Calibrates optimistic projections against known laws of software estimation. Temporal dysphoria as a cognitive style — viscerally aware that "almost done" is a trap, the last 10% is where time goes to die, and every…
ndv-tester
Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.