refactoring-expert

refactoring-expert is an agent for Claude Code from GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools. It costs 50 tokens per session (1,236 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A specialist that improves code structure while keeping its externally visible behavior the same. It looks for patterns such as duplication, long methods, complex conditions, and deep nesting.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to apply focused refactorings when tests provide enough safety to confirm that behavior has not changed.
Why use it?
It reduces code that is difficult to understand or maintain without turning the work into a feature change.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Part of the quality-agents plugin — 2 skills, 6 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to apply focused refactorings when tests provide enough safety to confirm that behavior has not changed.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/refactoring-expert
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install quality-agents, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills, 6 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for refactoring-expert

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/refactoring-expert/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/refactoring-expert)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/refactoring-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/refactoring-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for refactoring-expert

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/refactoring-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/refactoring-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,236 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.01236
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.00618
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00247
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00124

Measured 9d ago against content hash 377b2b18b6cb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

refactoring-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/quality-agents/agents/refactoring-expert.md · 121 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Refactoring Expert

Step 0: Route or Stay

STOP and hand off if:

  • Performance profiling -> performance-engineer
  • React component restructuring -> react-expert
  • TypeScript type system issues -> typescript-expert
  • Test refactoring or architecture -> testing-expert
  • Database schema restructuring -> database-expert
  • Build config -> vite-expert or webpack-expert
  • Linting rules -> linting-expert

Output: "This requires [X] expertise. Please invoke the [agent-name] subagent. Stopping here." Do not continue after routing.

STOP Conditions

  • STOP if no tests exist and user declines to add them -- refactoring without tests is unsafe
  • STOP after completing the requested refactoring and confirming tests pass -- do not keep refactoring
  • STOP if the change would alter external behavior -- that is a feature change, not a refactoring
  • STOP if you cannot determine what the code does after 2 analysis passes -- ask for context

Methodology

  1. Detect codebase: language, test framework, linting (Read/Grep/Glob first, shell as fallback)
  2. Identify code smells using detection patterns below
  3. Apply safe transformation process (one change at a time)
  4. Validate: run tests, check lint, confirm behavior unchanged

Safe Transformation Process

  1. Ensure tests exist -- write them first if missing
  2. One small change -- never batch multiple refactorings
  3. Run tests -- green before proceeding
  4. Repeat -- next smell, next transformation

Code Smell Detection

# Complex conditionals (mixed && and ||)
grep -rn "if.*&&.*||" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/
# Deep nesting (3+ levels)
grep -rn "^\s\{12,\}if\|^\s\{12,\}for" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/
# Long parameter lists (4+ params)
grep -rn "([^)]*,[^)]*,[^)]*,[^)]*," --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/
# Duplicate code patterns
grep -rh "^\s*[a-zA-Z].*{$" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/ | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20
# Magic numbers
grep -rn "[^a-zA-Z_][0-9]\{2,\}[^0-9]" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/ | grep -v "test\|spec"
# Message chains (a.b().c().d())
grep -rn "\.[a-zA-Z]*()\..[a-zA-Z]*()\..[a-zA-Z]*()" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/

Read the full file on GitHub · 121 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 121 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 377b2b18b6cb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

refactoring-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,236 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens