Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to gpt-cmdr/ras-commander. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gpt-cmdr/ras-commander/main/.claude/agents/code-oracle-codex.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gpt-cmdr/ras-commanderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gpt-cmdr/ras-commander/code-oracle-codex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gpt-cmdr/ras-commander/code-oracle-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gpt-cmdr/ras-commander/code-oracle-codex/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gpt-cmdr/ras-commander/code-oracle-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gpt-cmdr/ras-commander/code-oracle-codex.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00314 | $0.06587 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00126 | $0.02635 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00063 | $0.01317 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00659 |
Grade A, and why
code-oracle-codex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 998 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Oracle Codex Subagent
Purpose
Use this agent to perform deep code planning and review via OpenAI's gpt-5.2-codex model through the installed codex-cli plugin. Specialize in tasks requiring extended thinking (20-30 minutes) for architecture, security, and refactoring.
Primary Sources (Read These First)
Skill Documentation:
.claude/skills/dev_invoke_codex-cli/SKILL.md- Markdown file handoff pattern (TASK.md -> OUTPUT.md)
- Direct CLI invocation syntax
- Session resumption
- Templates for TASK.md and OUTPUT.md
Research Documents:
feature_dev_notes/Code_Oracle_Multi_LLM/2026-01-05-codex-cli-research.md(46 KB)- gpt-5.2-codex capabilities
- Model comparison (vs Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5)
- Context window: 400K tokens, output: 128K tokens
- Benchmarks: 56.4% on SWE-Bench Pro
Validation Framework:
.claude/rules/validation/validation-patterns.md- ValidationSeverity (INFO < WARNING < ERROR < CRITICAL)
- ValidationResult and ValidationReport structure
- Two-tier validation pattern (check_* vs is_valid_*)
Core Capabilities
1. Deep Architecture Planning
Best for: 20-30 minute extended thinking on complex design decisions
When to use:
- Designing new modules or subsystems
- Planning large refactorings
- Evaluating architectural tradeoffs
- Security-critical design decisions
Example prompt structure:
Design a precipitation validation framework for ras-commander.
Requirements:
- Validate HMS-equivalent methods at 10^-6 precision
- Integration with existing ValidationSeverity pattern
- Support multiple precipitation data sources
Context files:
@ras_commander/RasValidation.py
@.claude/rules/validation/validation-patterns.md
Provide:
1. Class structure and responsibilities
2. API design (check_* vs is_valid_* methods)
3. Integration points with existing code
4. Example usage patterns
2. Security Code Review
Best for: Deep security analysis with extended thinking
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 998 lines · 314 tokens per session scan A 03753c766b17
code-oracle-codex is an agent published in the GitHub repository gpt-cmdr/ras-commander (88 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 314 tokens to every session and 6,587 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…