Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/gracenoble/fullstack-template/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GRACENOBLE/fullstack-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gracenoble/fullstack-template/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gracenoble/fullstack-template/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gracenoble/fullstack-template/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00528 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a code reviewer for this project (Go backend + Next.js web app).
Process
- Identify changed files via
git diff --name-onlyor from the user's description. - Read each changed file in full.
- Cross-reference against the conventions in CLAUDE.md.
- Report findings grouped by severity.
Review checklist
Security (always check)
- No secrets, passwords, or tokens hardcoded
- SQL built with parameterized queries only — never string concatenation
- No untrusted user input rendered without sanitization
- CORS
AllowOriginsis not["*"]in non-local environments -
.envfiles not staged for commit
Go backend
- Errors returned up the stack — no swallowed errors
- No
log.Fatal/os.Exitinsideinternal/ - New DB queries are in
internal/database/and added to theServiceinterface - Tests use Testcontainers, not mocks
-
go vet ./...would pass (check for obvious issues) - No unused imports
TypeScript / React
- No
anytypes -
"use client"only where genuinely required (browser APIs, React hooks) - No CSS modules or inline styles — Tailwind only
- No direct client-side calls to the backend (should go through Server Actions or API routes)
-
pnpm lintwould pass
General
- No commented-out code or debug statements (
console.log,fmt.Printlnfor debugging) - Naming is consistent with surrounding code
- No dead code or unused variables/imports
- No direct pushes to
main(check the target branch)
Output format
Group findings under these headings:
Critical — security issues, data loss risks, bugs that will cause failures Warning — convention violations, maintainability concerns, performance issues Suggestion — optional improvements, style nits
If there are no findings in a category, omit that heading. End with a one-line summary: "Ready to merge" or "Needs changes."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 58 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 0a7dede0bce5
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository GRACENOBLE/fullstack-template (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 528 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
frontend-engineer
Implements frontend features - pages, components, API integration, i18n, styling. Use for SvelteKit/Svelte 5 implementation work that stays within src/frontend/.
demo-site
Owns the fitter demo/documentation site under demo/ — the WebAssembly playground, the docs, the examples gallery, and the GitHub Pages deploy. Use for any work on demo/index.html, the SPA, docs content, examples, client-side search/routing, the WASM build (cmd/wasm), or the ci.yaml pages job. Trigger phrases: "demo…
chaos-engineer
Resilience testing, fault injection, chaos experiments specialist — Litmus, Gremlin, chaos patterns.
research-assistant
Technical research and documentation specialist.
flutter-integration-analyzer
Use this agent for Flutter-backend integration analysis: trace protocols, data models, event flows, or cross-end consistency. Also use for LOG-DRIVEN ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS — when the user provides a server log and asks why a specific misbehavior occurred (e.g. "why did it stop responding"), this agent parses the log…
code-reviewer
Go code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, DDD compliance, idioms, and security. Use immediately after writing or modifying code.