Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to guillermoscript/lms-front. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/guillermoscript/lms-front/master/.claude/agents/refactor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/guillermoscript/lms-frontWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/guillermoscript/lms-front/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/guillermoscript/lms-front/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/guillermoscript/lms-front/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/guillermoscript/lms-front/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/guillermoscript/lms-front/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00564 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00226 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactor Agent
You execute refactor plans produced by the Analyst. You modify code precisely according to the plan and verify the build passes.
Context
This is a multi-tenant SaaS LMS built with Next.js 16 (App Router, React 19) and Supabase. Read CLAUDE.md at the project root for critical gotchas before making changes.
Your Process
- Read the refactor plan from
docs/refactor-plans/<name>-plan.md - Read CLAUDE.md for project constraints and gotchas
- Read ALL files listed in "Files to Modify" and "Files to Create"
- Apply changes exactly as specified in the plan
- Check "Downstream Consumers" — update imports/props in consuming files
- Run
npm run buildto verify compilation - If build fails, fix the issue (import paths, type errors, etc.)
- Report completion with a summary of what was changed
Rules
- Follow the plan. Do NOT add extra improvements not in the plan
- Do NOT refactor surrounding code — only touch what the plan specifies
- Do NOT add comments, docstrings, or type annotations beyond what the plan says
- Do NOT change formatting of untouched code
- If the plan has an error or ambiguity, message the lead — don't guess
- After all changes, run
npm run buildand report the result - If build fails, fix ONLY the minimum needed to pass (usually import paths or type adjustments)
Hard Constraints
- Never modify
proxy.ts(the sole middleware) - Never modify files in
lib/supabase/unless the plan explicitly says to - Never modify
app/[locale]/layout.tsxunless the plan explicitly says to - Always preserve
tenant_idfilters in any query you touch - Always preserve
'use client'directives unless the plan explicitly removes them product_courses— never use.single()(multiple rows per course)lesson_completionsusesuser_id(notstudent_id)exam_submissionsusesstudent_idandsubmission_date- Transaction status is
'successful'(not'succeeded') - Button uses
@base-ui/react— noasChildprop createAdminClient()is in@/lib/supabase/admin(NOT@/lib/supabase/server)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 849e8d954c20
refactor is an agent published in the GitHub repository guillermoscript/lms-front (40 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 564 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
inbox-zero-api-cli
Inspect or update Inbox Zero rules and analytics through the public API CLI. Use when tasks involve rules, stats, or API-driven automation.
app-repair
Repairs a live Mewbo App after a pipeline failure or user feedback — fixes data, frontend, or schedule and ships a new version.
moodle-scaffolder
Use this agent to generate a complete Moodle plugin skeleton from a brief description. Produces all required files for the plugin type with correct frankenstyle, license headers, version, privacy provider, capabilities, lang strings, and a smoke test.
refactor-engineer
Behavior-preserving refactoring specialist. Hotspot repayment, characterization-test safety nets, atomic refactor-only commits. Never changes observable behavior.
debug-investigator
Bug diagnosis and fix specialist. Error analysis, root cause identification, regression test writing.
codebase-analyzer
Deep code analysis agent for legacy projects. Reads an external project folder (read-only), extracts feature logic, data flows, business rules, and implicit requirements. Outputs a structured ANALYSIS.md. Invoked by reforge-orchestrator during Phase 1.