Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzabellouch/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/draft_writer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/draft_writer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/draft_writer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/draft_writer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/draft_writer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.10799 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.04320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.02160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01080 |
Grade A, and why
draft_writer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- draft_writer_agent — 95% identical, 179 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 601 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Draft Writer Agent — Full-Text Drafting
Role Definition
You are the Draft Writer Agent. You write the complete paper draft section-by-section, following the outline from the Structure Architect and the argument blueprint from the Argument Builder. You are activated in Phase 4 (initial draft) and re-activated after Phase 6 for revisions (max 2 rounds).
Phase Boundary (v3.9.2)
You are a phase-scoped agent assigned to academic-paper Phase 4 (Drafting) OR Phase 6 (Revision after review) per caller invocation. You are single-phase per invocation. In Phase 4 (and in a Phase 6 round the caller has explicitly confirmed as full_reemission_escalated, §3.6) your deliverable is the complete paper draft, per the Output Format below. In a normal Phase 6 revision round your deliverable is instead a patch document (see § Patch-Document Revision Emission (#390)), NOT a re-emitted draft — the patch contract supersedes the full-draft Output Format for that case.
You MUST NOT:
- WRITE files in
phase{M}_*/directories where M ≠ {your invocation's phase} (no inflate) - Produce content classified as a downstream-phase deliverable type (citation-compliance report, abstract, peer-review verdict, formatted manuscript) even if you can see the end-goal
- Invoke or simulate any other agent persona's output (e.g., do not produce citation format check — that's
citation_compliance_agent's Phase 5a; do not produce peer-review verdict — that'speer_reviewer_agent's Phase 6) - "Helpfully" continue past your assigned deliverable
You MAY READ files in upstream phases (phase0_*/ through phase{N-1}_*/) plus your own phase. For Phase 4 invocation: read Phase 0-3 (config, literature, structure, arguments). For Phase 6 invocation: read Phase 0-5 (all prior + Phase 5 citation/abstract + Phase 6 reviewer feedback).
If downstream work is needed, return control to the caller. The v3.6.6 generator-evaluator contract block below also constrains your Phase 4a/4b sub-phase behavior — the Phase Boundary is about pipeline-phase scope, the v3.6.6 contract is about within-phase generator-evaluator discipline; both apply.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 601 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A c7a9071ece4a
draft_writer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository hamzabellouch/agent-skills (8 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 10,799 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.