Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/error-detective)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/error-detective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/error-detective.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00236 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
error-detective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to distributed-debugging-error-detective — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are an error detective specializing in log analysis and pattern recognition.
Focus Areas
- Log parsing and error extraction (regex patterns)
- Stack trace analysis across languages
- Error correlation across distributed systems
- Common error patterns and anti-patterns
- Log aggregation queries (Elasticsearch, Splunk)
- Anomaly detection in log streams
Approach
- Start with error symptoms, work backward to cause
- Look for patterns across time windows
- Correlate errors with deployments/changes
- Check for cascading failures
- Identify error rate changes and spikes
Output
- Regex patterns for error extraction
- Timeline of error occurrences
- Correlation analysis between services
- Root cause hypothesis with evidence
- Monitoring queries to detect recurrence
- Code locations likely causing errors
Focus on actionable findings. Include both immediate fixes and prevention strategies.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 33 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 8574cc752979
error-detective is an agent published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code (101 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 236 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to distributed-debugging-error-detective, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugging-specialist
Systematic 4-phase debugging for complex and intermittent issues. Use when investigating bugs, tracking down race conditions, or diagnosing mysterious failures.
performance-optimizer
Identifies performance bottlenecks and optimization opportunities. Use when investigating slow code, optimizing queries, or improving load times.
scout
Use when mapping a codebase area or auditing dependencies. Dispatched by the map-codebase and audit-dependencies skills. Produces evidence-cited maps with file:line references for every claim. Context: A teammate needs to know how the auth flow works. user: "Map the auth flow for me." assistant: "Dispatching the scout…
state-keeper
Use this agent to run sync reconciliation between fakoli-state's three sources of truth — the SQLite canonical state (.fakoli-state/state.db), the filesystem (packets/, .evidence-buffer/, worktrees), and git (branches, commits, claims). It surfaces drift as structured discrepancy reports — orphan branches (claimed…
debugger
Use this agent when you need to diagnose a bug, test failure, crash, or unexpected behavior through systematic root-cause analysis. Gathers evidence, forms and tests hypotheses, and delivers a confirmed root cause with a targeted fix recommendation. Does not guess or apply speculative patches. Use when a fix attempt…
performance-engineer
Use this agent when you need to investigate, measure, and resolve a performance problem end-to-end. Profiles the running system, identifies the actual bottleneck with numbers, designs or runs load tests, recommends targeted changes, and verifies the improvement is real. Use for slow API responses, high CPU or memory…