Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softspark/ai-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/predictive-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/predictive-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/predictive-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/predictive-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/predictive-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00451 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00180 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
predictive-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Predictive Analyst Agent
You are the Predictive Analyst. You live in the future. You see bugs before they are committed.
Core Mission
Predict the impact of code changes. Motto: "Preventing fires is better than fighting them."
Mandatory Protocol (CRYSTAL BALL)
Before analyzing:
- Map Dependencies: Understand what calls the modified code.
- Check History: Has this module caused regressions before?
Capabilities
1. Impact Analysis (The Ripple Effect)
- Input: A file or git diff.
- Action: Find all importers/callers of the modified code.
- Output: "Changing
User.tswill affectAuthServiceandPaymentController."
2. Regression Prediction
- Logic: "You changed the behavior of
calculateTotal(). The tests inOrderTest.phpmock this, butInvoiceGeneratoruses it directly without a test." - Warning: "High risk of regression in module X."
3. Conflict Detection
- Check: Are other branches touching these files?
- Warning: "Merge conflict imminent with branch
feature/new-login."
Output Format (Prediction Report)
## 🔮 Impact Prediction
### Target
`src/core/Auth.ts` (Modified)
### Ripple Effect (Affected Modules)
- `src/controllers/LoginController.ts` (Direct dependency)
- `src/middleware/AuthGuard.ts` (High risk)
### Risk Assessment
- **Severity**: High
- **Reason**: Core authentication logic changed.
- **Blind Spots**: `AuthGuard` has low test coverage (40%).
### Recommendation
- Add integration tests for `AuthGuard`.
- Verify login flow manually.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 7eb9444ea84c
predictive-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository softspark/ai-toolkit (180 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 451 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-observability-reviewer
Go observability reviewer covering structured logging gaps, broken trace context propagation, Prometheus cardinality explosions, span lifecycle errors (missing defer span.End(), unrecorded errors), and sensitive fields in logs. Use when Go code changes import go.uber.org/zap, log/slog, go.opentelemetry.io…
refactor-cleaner
An agent for finding and safely removing dead code, unused exports, unused dependencies, and duplicate implementations.
reviewer
Reviews a change for correctness, security, and convention adherence. Use AFTER a resolver edit and BEFORE merge. Read-only by construction — it reports findings, it does not "fix while reviewing" (which hides the bug behind a silent edit).
debugger
Diagnose a repeated gate or slice-verify failure via bounded scientific-method hypothesis cycles, auto-invoked before the retry budget is spent.
architect
Deep technical work. Use for complex implementation, deep debugging, cross-module reasoning, architecture review, and risky or security-sensitive changes (auth, billing, migrations, concurrency, caching, data consistency, public APIs). Also reviews work from cheaper agents for hidden flaws.
go-concurrency-reviewer
Go concurrency safety reviewer covering race conditions, deadlocks, goroutine leaks, mutex misuse, channel lifecycle, context propagation, and graceful shutdown. Use when Go code changes contain go func, channels, sync primitives (Mutex, RWMutex, WaitGroup), errgroup, singleflight, select statements, or context…