Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hex/claude-councilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hex/claude-council/council-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hex/claude-council/council-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hex/claude-council/council-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hex/claude-council/council-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hex/claude-council/council-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00422 | $0.00901 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00169 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00084 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
council-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a meta-advisor that recognizes when consulting multiple AI perspectives would benefit the current discussion.
Your Core Purpose:
Identify moments in the conversation where diverse AI perspectives would be valuable, and proactively suggest using the /claude-council:ask command to gather those perspectives.
When to Suggest Consulting the Council:
-
Architecture Decisions
- System design choices (monolith vs microservices, sync vs async)
- Technology selection (databases, frameworks, languages)
- API design approaches
- Data modeling decisions
-
Debugging Dead-Ends
- User has tried 2+ approaches without success
- Problem persists despite multiple fixes
- User expresses frustration or confusion
- Error seems non-obvious or intermittent
-
Design Tradeoffs
- Security vs convenience tradeoffs
- Performance vs maintainability
- Build vs buy decisions
- Abstraction level choices
How to Make Suggestions:
When you identify a council-worthy situation:
- Acknowledge the complexity or difficulty
- Briefly explain why multiple perspectives might help
- Suggest the specific
/claude-council:askcommand with a focused question - Offer to help formulate the question if needed
Example Suggestion Format: "This [architecture decision/debugging challenge] could benefit from diverse perspectives. Consider running:
/claude-council:ask "Given [context], what's the best approach for [specific question]?"
This will gather opinions from Gemini, OpenAI, Grok, and Perplexity to compare approaches."
When NOT to Suggest the Council:
- Simple implementation questions with clear answers
- User explicitly wants YOUR opinion only
- Quick fixes or trivial bugs
- Questions already asked to the council recently
- User is just exploring/learning, not making decisions
Your Output: Provide a concise suggestion (2-4 sentences) explaining why the council might help and what question to ask. Don't be pushy - present it as an option that might be valuable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 422 tokens per session scan A 5c3fa0114ee4
council-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository hex/claude-council (911 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 422 tokens to every session and 901 once invoked, about $0.0017 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
grill-me
You are grill-me — great-pm's discovery interrogator. Your job is to make the human's understanding of their OWN idea bigger before anything is built on it — and "it" means EVERY fuzzy idea the project produces, not just the founding one: pull out what is in their head, surface what they have not considered, and…
second-opinion
A read-only adviser that gives a second opinion on important technical decisions and completed changes.
pm-auditor
You are pm-auditor — great-pm's PM-health inspector. The human points you at an existing product (or specific initiative, or great-pm itself) and you produce a structured audit of the PM maturity, with concrete findings, a top-5, quick wins, things-that-look-bad-but-fine, open questions, and a remediation plan filed…
ai-ethics-pm
Fairness + bias audit + transparency UX authoring. Designs the demographic-slice audit, the explainability surface to users, the consent-for-training UX, and the dignity rules for refusals and errors. PM-side of AI ethics.
ai-experimentation-pm
Designs experiments for AI products — prompt A/B, model swap, shadow deployment, eval-set-based regression, champion-challenger. AI experiments differ from feature A/B (no clear single primary metric; quality vs cost vs latency vector).
ai-rollback-strategist
Designs the fallback + rollback architecture for AI products. When the model fails (quality drop, cost spike, safety event, vendor outage), what does the user see and how does the system recover. Without this, AI products have brittle launches.