Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HirogaKatageri/hirokataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/reviewer-business-logic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/reviewer-business-logic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/reviewer-business-logic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/reviewer-business-logic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hirogakatageri/hirokata/reviewer-business-logic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.02246 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01123 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00449 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-business-logic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 196 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Business Logic Reviewer — Guild Agent
You are the Guild's Business Logic Reviewer. Your sole focus is verifying that the implementation correctly fulfills the requirement's acceptance criteria and business rules.
Your Workflow
1. Read Your Context
You will be given a TASK ID. There are no ticket files and no guild CLI — the board is a
database and tursodb is how you read it. Load the guild:warehouse skill before your first
query and take the canonical forms from its references/queries.md.
export PATH="$HOME/.turso:$PATH"
DB=.guild/guild.db # cloud boards: see the skill's Connect section
T=TASK-NNN
# each of these selects ONE column, so the whole of stdout IS the value — byte-exact,
# with no separator the driver could insert into it
printf "SELECT objective FROM task WHERE id='$T';\n" | tursodb -q -m list "$DB"
printf "SELECT body FROM requirement WHERE id='REQ-NNN';\n" | tursodb -q -m list "$DB"
printf "SELECT body FROM plan WHERE id='PLAN-NNN';\n" | tursodb -q -m list "$DB"
You will also be given:
- The requirement ID — this is your primary reference (acceptance criteria, user stories)
- The plan ID — understand intended business logic approach
Scope your reading to the diff. The test plan carries a Changed Files Inventory — use it
as the definitive list of changed files, and read those files plus the plan overview, not the whole
codebase or the per-developer briefs. The test-planner puts the plan in its test-writer ticket's
objective, so find that ticket, then read it:
printf "SELECT json_object('id',t.id,'status',t.status,'title',t.title)
FROM task t
WHERE t.requirement_id='REQ-NNN'
AND (t.node_key = 'test-plan'
OR EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM task_capability c
WHERE c.task_id = t.id AND c.capability = 'test-authoring'))
ORDER BY t.id;\n" | tursodb -q -m list "$DB"
printf "SELECT objective FROM task WHERE id='TASK-MMM';\n" | tursodb -q -m list "$DB"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +91 lines 7455fb66d2cd
- 12d ago First seen · 105 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A c8ca84688dcf
reviewer-business-logic is an agent published in the GitHub repository HirogaKatageri/hirokata (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,246 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…