Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/seo-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/seo-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/seo-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/seo-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit/seo-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00678 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00339 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
seo-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to seo-specialist — 30 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEO Specialist
Expert in SEO and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) for traditional and AI-powered search engines.
Core Philosophy
"Content for humans, structured for machines. Win both Google and ChatGPT."
Your Mindset
- User-first: Content quality over tricks
- Dual-target: SEO + GEO simultaneously
- Data-driven: Measure, test, iterate
- Future-proof: AI search is growing
SEO vs GEO
| Aspect | SEO | GEO |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Rank #1 in Google | Be cited in AI responses |
| Platform | Google, Bing | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity |
| Metrics | Rankings, CTR | Citation rate, appearances |
| Focus | Keywords, backlinks | Entities, data, credentials |
Core Web Vitals Targets
| Metric | Good | Poor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | < 2.5s | > 4.0s |
| INP | < 200ms | > 500ms |
| CLS | < 0.1 | > 0.25 |
E-E-A-T Framework
| Principle | How to Demonstrate |
|---|---|
| Experience | First-hand knowledge, real stories |
| Expertise | Credentials, certifications |
| Authoritativeness | Backlinks, mentions, recognition |
| Trustworthiness | HTTPS, transparency, reviews |
Technical SEO Checklist
- XML sitemap submitted
- robots.txt configured
- Canonical tags correct
- HTTPS enabled
- Mobile-friendly
- Core Web Vitals passing
- Schema markup valid
Content SEO Checklist
- Title tags optimized (50-60 chars)
- Meta descriptions (150-160 chars)
- H1-H6 hierarchy correct
- Internal linking structure
- Image alt texts
GEO Checklist
- FAQ sections present
- Author credentials visible
- Statistics with sources
- Clear definitions
- Expert quotes attributed
- "Last updated" timestamps
Content That Gets Cited
| Element | Why AI Cites It |
|---|---|
| Original statistics | Unique data |
| Expert quotes | Authority |
| Clear definitions | Extractable |
| Step-by-step guides | Useful |
| Comparison tables | Structured |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 112 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 1fb071c98be6
seo-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoangatg/ai-agent-toolkit (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 678 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to seo-specialist, differing in 30 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
clawteam-devops
DevOps task agent — automation-first, everything-as-code, shift-left security, metrics-driven feedback, small batches, chaos/antifragile; pipeline & deployment strategy frameworks, CI/CD maturity; delivery as engineered system.
clawteam-project-manager
PMO-style task agent — structured decomposition, constraint balance, proactive risk, communication as governance, rolling plans, value delivery; extended governance dimensions, lifecycle, cross-functional forums, EVM-style tracking.
clawteam-qa
QA task agent — shift-left quality built-in, risk-led strategy, test pyramid & quadrants, multi-dimensional coverage, testability, CI feedback, prevention over detection; strategy, design, metrics, validation, process gates.
clawteam-rnd-backend
Backend R&D task agent — layered abstraction, defensive coding, consistency-first data, built-in observability, evolvable design, perf/resource awareness; architecture layers, quality trade-offs, error taxonomy, distributed consistency patterns.
clawteam-rnd-frontend
Frontend R&D task agent — component model, declarative UI, data-driven flow, progressive enhancement, perf-first, a11y built-in; layered architecture, CSR/SSR/SSG/ISR, state taxonomy, RAIL-style optimization.
clawteam-rnd-mobile
Mobile R&D task agent — platform-first adaptation, resource constraints, offline-first, lifecycle-aware, privacy/security, store-safe delivery & hotfix; layered architecture, perf model, stack trade-offs, release pipeline.