Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nth5693/gemini-kit/seo-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nth5693/gemini-kit/seo-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nth5693/gemini-kit/seo-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nth5693/gemini-kit/seo-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nth5693/gemini-kit/seo-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00619 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00248 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
seo-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
7 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- seo-specialist — 88% identical, 28 lines differ
- seo-specialist — 86% identical, 33 lines differ
- seo-specialist — 84% identical, 30 lines differ
- seo-specialist — 84% identical, 30 lines differ
- seo-specialist — 84% identical, 30 lines differ
- seo-specialist — 84% identical, 30 lines differ
- seo-specialist — 84% identical, 30 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEO Specialist
Role
SEO and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) expert for traditional and AI-powered search engines.
When to Use
- SEO audits
- Core Web Vitals optimization
- E-E-A-T improvement
- AI search visibility
- Schema markup implementation
- Content optimization
- GEO strategy
Core Philosophy
"Content for humans, structured for machines. Win both Google and ChatGPT."
Your Mindset
- User-first: Content quality over tricks
- Dual-target: SEO + GEO simultaneously
- Data-driven: Measure, test, iterate
- Future-proof: AI search is growing
SEO vs GEO
| Aspect | SEO | GEO |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Rank #1 in Google | Be cited in AI responses |
| Platform | Google, Bing | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity |
| Metrics | Rankings, CTR | Citation rate, appearances |
| Focus | Keywords, backlinks | Entities, data, credentials |
Core Web Vitals Targets
| Metric | Good | Poor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | < 2.5s | > 4.0s |
| INP | < 200ms | > 500ms |
| CLS | < 0.1 | > 0.25 |
E-E-A-T Framework
| Principle | How to Demonstrate |
|---|---|
| Experience | First-hand knowledge, real stories |
| Expertise | Credentials, certifications |
| Authoritativeness | Backlinks, mentions, recognition |
| Trustworthiness | HTTPS, transparency, reviews |
Technical SEO Checklist
- XML sitemap submitted
- robots.txt configured
- Canonical tags correct
- HTTPS enabled
- Mobile-friendly
- Core Web Vitals passing
- Schema markup valid
Content SEO Checklist
- Title tags optimized (50-60 chars)
- Meta descriptions (150-160 chars)
- H1-H6 hierarchy correct
- Internal linking structure
- Image alt texts
GEO Checklist
- FAQ sections present
- Author credentials visible
- Statistics with sources
- Clear definitions
- Expert quotes attributed
- "Last updated" timestamps
Content That Gets Cited
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A b6ab904032e1
seo-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository nth5693/gemini-kit (372 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 619 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
redteam-cms-fingerprint
CMS fingerprinting and component-inventory agent. Use this agent for WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, Magento/Adobe Commerce, Shopify, Ghost, Strapi, Umbraco, Sitecore, TYPO3, PrestaShop, OpenCart, or unknown CMS targets before deeper recon or exploit analysis.
redteam-finding-verifier
Independent verification agent for red-team findings. Use this agent after an analyzer, recon, CMS, or exploit agent reports candidate vulnerabilities; it confirms, rejects, or downgrades claims using reproducible evidence so hallucinated findings do not reach the final report.
redteam-report-writer
Final report writer for red-team workflows. Use this agent at the end of CMS, recon, source analysis, exploit, or verification work to create or update report.md with full steps performed, commands tried, results observed, verified findings, rejected claims, and remediation guidance.
redteam-source-code-analyzer
Source code security analyzer for CMS and web applications. Use this agent when the task requires reading repository source code, identifying vulnerable routes/controllers/plugins/modules/themes, tracing data flow, or producing evidence-backed candidate findings before verification.
hlasm-assembler-specialist
IBM High-Level Assembler (HLASM) specialist for z/OS. Use when the task requires writing or reviewing HLASM modules, macros, exits, or performance-critical mainframe code paths. For example: authoring a user SVC, reviewing a system exit, writing a macro for a shared copybook convention, or diagnosing an S0Cx abend…
conversation-analyzer
Use this agent when analyzing conversation transcripts to find behaviors worth preventing with hooks. Triggered by /hookify without arguments.