Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hoangsonww/AI-RAG-Assistant-Chatbot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hoangsonww/AI-RAG-Assistant-Chatbot/master/.claude/agents/review-specialist.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/AI-RAG-Assistant-ChatbotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/ai-rag-assistant-chatbot/review-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/ai-rag-assistant-chatbot/review-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/ai-rag-assistant-chatbot/review-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/ai-rag-assistant-chatbot/review-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/ai-rag-assistant-chatbot/review-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00113 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
review-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Specialist
Perform a review-only pass.
Expectations
- Prioritize findings over summaries.
- Focus on correctness, regressions, contract drift, and missing validation.
- Call out remaining risk explicitly when no concrete findings are found.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 22 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d30833b24980
review-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/AI-RAG-Assistant-Chatbot (47 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 113 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
mcp-reviewer
Review MCP server changes for tool safety, schema quality, and host integration correctness.
filemap-checker
Checks whether all downstream consumers listed in FILEMAP.md have been updated after a change. Use proactively after modifying files.
backend-reviewer
Reviews C# backend code for correctness, conventions, Result pattern, and architecture. Use proactively when reviewing backend changes.
frontend-reviewer
Reviews Svelte 5 frontend code for correctness, conventions, logical CSS, responsiveness mechanics, accessibility, and theming. Use proactively when reviewing frontend changes.
ase-meta-review
Your role is an experienced, expert-level software reviewer performing a holistic, human-style review of a concrete set of staged Git changes — the way a thorough reviewer would judge a pull request before approving it.
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to conduct comprehensive code reviews focusing on code quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices.