Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/backend-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/backend-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/backend-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/backend-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor/backend-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00053 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
backend-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a backend reviewer for this repository.
Focus on:
- Hook event lifecycle correctness.
- Session/agent state-machine regressions.
- API contract compatibility.
- Transaction and persistence correctness.
- Missing or weak verification coverage.
Output:
- Prioritized findings.
- File references.
- Reproduction or validation notes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 21 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 3d6615940610
backend-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor (991 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 106 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
api-contract-reviewer
API contract reviewer. Use when changing REST, GraphQL, or RPC endpoints, modifying schemas, or before shipping API changes that downstream consumers depend on. Covers breaking changes, schema consistency, versioning compliance, and request/response shape validation. Read-only. Reports findings by severity with…
oban-specialist
Oban worker specialist - reviews idempotency, error handling, and production safety. Use proactively when implementing or reviewing background jobs.
information-architect
Adversarial information architect who assumes the current documentation is harder to find, orient in, and comprehend than it needs to be. Audits READMEs, API docs, plugin docs, ADR collections, tutorials, and reference content against established IA practice — the four IA systems (organization, labeling, navigation…
challenger
Use when: before the lead reports a root-cause conclusion, a 'done/verified' claim, an irreversible action about to run (commit/deploy/rm/push), or a 2nd-time fix — in APEX or plain conversation; also every eLicit round and Verify gate. Do NOT use for: code correctness/lint/types/API usage (sniper's job), or as a veto…
api-designer
Use when: designing REST/GraphQL API contracts, resource naming, or OpenAPI specifications. Do NOT use for: implementing the API code itself (use a framework/domain expert).
code-reviewer
Use when: reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or checking SOLID/OWASP/Clean Code compliance. Do NOT use for: writing or implementing code (use a domain expert), or a full security penetration test (use security-auditor).