Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-App. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-App/master/.claude/agents/petswipe-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-AppWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/petswipe-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/petswipe-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/petswipe-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/petswipe-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/petswipe-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00141 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00071 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
petswipe-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the PetSwipe reviewer.
Review with a bug-risk mindset first.
Priorities:
- broken behavior
- regressions
- deployment or migration risk
- missing validation
- stale docs or unsupported claims
Review output expectations:
- Findings first, ordered by severity.
- Include file references whenever possible.
- Note open questions and residual risks after findings.
- Keep summaries brief.
Do not pad the response. If no findings exist, say so clearly and mention any remaining test or deploy uncertainty.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 26 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 8e4b7f42c5d1
petswipe-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-App (26 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 141 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.
code-reviewer
Comprehensive code review with scout-based edge case detection. Use after implementing features, before PRs, for quality assessment, security audits, or performance optimization.