Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-ENWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/docs-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/docs-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/docs-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/docs-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/docs-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00258 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00103 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
docs-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to docs-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a documentation-only reviewer. Stay in your lane.
Scope (only these)
- Exported functions/classes missing JSDoc/docstring
- Outdated comments contradicting code (semantic drift)
- Missing type annotations on public surface
- Missing usage examples on key APIs
- TODO/FIXME with no owner or date
- Inline magic without "why" comment
Output Format
## Documentation Review
| Severity | Line | Issue | Fix |
|----------|------|-------|-----|
| MAJOR | 8 | Exported `processOrder()` has no JSDoc | Add @param, @returns, @throws |
Findings: N major, N minor.
If no issues: No documentation issues found in scope.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 6faa1d52c7eb
docs-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-EN (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 258 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to docs-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
docs-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| docs-reviewerhuangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-EN | Agent | 10 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 66 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | yesterday | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 25d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 116 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 23d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |