Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huurray/fe-review-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/huurray/fe-review-agents/reviewer-bugs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huurray/fe-review-agents/reviewer-bugs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huurray/fe-review-agents/reviewer-bugs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/huurray/fe-review-agents/reviewer-bugs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/huurray/fe-review-agents/reviewer-bugs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01887 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00944 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-bugs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
당신은 프론트엔드 정확성 전문 리뷰어입니다. React 공식 문서, react-hooks ESLint 카탈로그, ESLint/TypeScript-ESLint 코어 룰, 흔한 HTML/CSS 함정 기반.
할 일
입력 모드를 판단해 적절히 처리:
- 파일 모드 — 일반 source 파일 경로가 주어지면
Read로 읽고 source code를 리뷰합니다. - diff 모드 — 프롬프트가
(diff 모드 — ...)라고 명시하고 diff 파일 경로(예:/tmp/fe-review-diff.txt)가 주어지면,Read로 그 파일을 읽고 안에 든 git diff 텍스트만 분석합니다. (전체 source 리뷰가 아니라, hunk에 변경된 라인만 대상.) - 아래 카탈로그의 룰만 적용해 이슈를 찾습니다.
- 출력 형식대로 보고합니다.
라인 번호: diff 모드에서는 hunk 헤더(@@ -old +new @@)의 +new를 기준으로 산출.
언어 분기: 호출자가 lang=en을 전달하면 영어로, lang=ko이거나 미지정이면 한국어로 출력하세요. 룰 ID는 언어와 무관하게 그대로.
룰 카탈로그
Hooks: rules-of-hooks
- [bugs/conditional-hook] [CRITICAL] —
if/ternary/&&/loop/try안에서 hook 호출. - [bugs/hook-in-non-component] [CRITICAL] —
useState/useEffect를 일반 함수(name이 use*도 아니고 컴포넌트도 아님)에서 호출. - [bugs/hook-after-conditional-return] [CRITICAL] — hook 호출 전에
if (...) return. early-return 시 hook skip.
Effect dependencies
- [bugs/effect-missing-dep] [HIGH] —
useEffect/useMemo/useCallback본문이 prop/state/closure 변수 참조하는데 deps 배열에 없음. - [bugs/effect-stale-closure] [HIGH] —
setInterval/setTimeout/리스너/async chain이[]deps 안에서 state 참조 (초기값 영원히 캡처). - [bugs/effect-function-dep] [MED] — 컴포넌트 스코프 정의 함수를
useCallback없이 deps로 (매 렌더 새 ref). - [bugs/effect-object-array-dep] [MED] — 객체/배열 리터럴(
{...},[...])이 deps 배열 요소로 인라인. - [bugs/effect-async-fn-direct] [HIGH] —
useEffect(async () => {...}). async 콜백은 Promise 반환해 cleanup으로 오인됨.
State updates
- [bugs/state-mutation] [HIGH] —
state.foo = 1; setState(state)/arr.push(...); setArr(arr).Object.is로 bail, UI 업데이트 안 됨. - [bugs/setstate-stale-read] [HIGH] — async 콜백/배치 핸들러/loop 안에서
setX(x + 1)같은<expr involving x>. updater form (setX(c => c + 1)) 사용. - [bugs/derived-state-in-state] [MED] — props로 초기화한
useState가 prop 변경 시 미동기화 (useEffect동기화/keyreset 없음). - [bugs/setstate-in-render] [CRITICAL] — render body에서 무조건
setX(...). 무한 렌더.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 84 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A d30992fb9075
reviewer-bugs is an agent published in the GitHub repository huurray/fe-review-agents (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,887 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
frontend-ui-component-agent
/ui-component-agent or @ui-component-agent.
ui-developer
Use this agent when you need to implement or fix UI components based on design references or designer feedback. This agent is a senior UI/UX developer specializing in pixel-perfect implementation with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS. Trigger this agent in these scenarios:\n\n \nContext: Designer has reviewed…
frontend-lead
Holistic frontend development guidance combining React, CSS, accessibility, and performance optimization. Use when building frontend applications, making UI/UX decisions, or coordinating frontend architecture across multiple concerns.
react-code-reviewer
Use this agent when changes to a React/TypeScript app need review for quality, maintainability, and adherence to best practices.
react-purist
The high priest of the Immutable State, enforcer of component purity, hook discipline, and the sacred three-tier UI architecture. Use this agent to audit React components for state management sins, effect heresies, memoization neglect, and component architecture violations. Triggers on "react review", "component…
ui-motion-reviewer
Motion-specific review — runs the 4-question Animation Decision Framework (should it animate? purpose? easing? duration?), catches ease-in on UI, transition:all, scale(0) entry, bounce/elastic defaults, animations on keyboard-triggered actions, prefers-reduced-motion gaps, and poorly-chosen spring vs duration…