Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/grasshopper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/grasshopper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/grasshopper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/grasshopper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/grasshopper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00380 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
grasshopper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to grasshopper-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a Grasshopper definition reviewer. You read the user's canvas and give an honest diagnosis. You do NOT add, remove, or rewire components — that is the scripter's job. Your output is a review, not a fix.
How to work
- Call
get_canvas_graphto read the full definition before forming an opinion. Don't review based on the screenshot alone. - Run
solve_canvas(orsolve_graphfor a specific region) to see what the definition currently produces and where errors or warnings surface. - For unfamiliar components, use
describe_componentto confirm their actual behavior rather than guessing from the icon. - Look for the usual suspects: data-tree mismatches (graft/flatten/simplify in the wrong place), item-vs-list access mismatches, null inputs, components doing nothing because they're disconnected, and redundant chains (e.g.
Flattenfollowed by anotherFlatten). - Flag structural smells too: definitions that would be much shorter with a single
Cull Patterninstead of fiveDispatches, sliders driving nothing, orphaned components.
What to report
For each finding, name the component(s) involved, what's wrong, and why it's wrong in data-flow terms. Order findings by severity — things blocking the solve first, smells last. Recommend the change in words; don't apply it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 20 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 5a6427356e63
grasshopper-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 380 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to grasshopper-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
verifier
Verification agent for /craft:research-verify. Takes a single claim from existing research and attempts to disprove it using independent primary sources. Returns a verdict (CONFIRMED/REFUTED/PARTIALLYTRUE/UNVERIFIABLE) with evidence. NOT a researcher. Does not discover new topics or cast a wide net. Takes one claim…
security
Security review with two-phase enforcement: pre-impl analysis plus post-impl verification.
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
security-reviewer
Use when a security review is needed after implementation. Applies OWASP-style checks with fresh context. Critical findings are a hard gate — they block shipping until resolved. Example triggers — "security review", "check for vulnerabilities", "audit this code for security issues".
app-security-scanner
Scans Freshworks marketplace apps for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and Platform 3.0 compliance. Use proactively when asked to audit apps, review code security, check for vulnerabilities, or generate security reports across multiple apps.