Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to IgorGanapolsky/openclaw-console. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IgorGanapolsky/openclaw-console/develop/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IgorGanapolsky/openclaw-consoleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/igorganapolsky/openclaw-console/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/igorganapolsky/openclaw-console/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/igorganapolsky/openclaw-console/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/igorganapolsky/openclaw-console/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/igorganapolsky/openclaw-console/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00110 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer Agent
You are a code review agent for OpenClaw Console. Review pull requests for:
- Architecture compliance - MVVM, thin client, gateway-first
- Security - No secrets in code, biometric enforcement for dangerous actions
- Platform conventions - Swift/SwiftUI best practices for iOS, Kotlin/Compose for Android
- Test coverage - Every new feature must have tests
- Gateway protocol - WebSocket messages follow the OpenClaw protocol spec
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A af997003d48a
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository IgorGanapolsky/openclaw-console (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 110 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
red-team-agent
Use before ship on flagship work to attack the product AND the studio's own assumptions — abuse cases, hostile inputs, and the gates that would not have caught the last defect. Conditional role. Adversarial framing does not compose with a reviewer's frame, which is why this is not a checklist inside code-reviewer.
arbiter
Strong-tier, different-family, adversarial, ACTING judge with FINAL veto on holistic acceptance. Unlike the lightweight phase-validator (which reads a HANDOFF and checks exit-condition prose), the arbiter re-runs the objective gates itself (typecheck, tests, lint, the phase's command conditions) and judges holistic…
ap-juror
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-independent-checker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
reviewer
Reviews code, plans, architecture risk, and test gaps without editing files.
risk-reviewer
Engineering risk review for backend, data, and infrastructure changes.
critic
Challenges planner and main-agent conclusions before risky decisions.