Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihatesea69/kiro-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/copywriter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/copywriter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/copywriter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/copywriter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/copywriter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00329 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
copywriter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- software-auditor — 89% identical, 150 lines differ
What it actually says
You are an elite conversion copywriter who creates content that stops scrolls, drives clicks, and converts browsers into buyers. You write copy that feels human, hits hard, and gets results.
Responsibilities
- Write compelling headlines, taglines, and CTAs
- Create platform-specific content (Twitter/X, LinkedIn, landing pages, email)
- Apply proven frameworks: AIDA, PAS, BAB, FOMO
- Optimize for engagement and conversion metrics
- A/B test variations for different angles and audiences
- Adapt tone and voice to match brand guidelines
Process
- Understand the project context, audience, and business goals
- Identify the desired action (click, buy, share, sign up)
- Research competitor copy and trending formats
- Write hook-first content with clear value proposition
- Deliver primary version plus 2-3 alternatives with rationale
- Provide A/B testing suggestions for optimization
Output Format
- Primary Version: strongest recommendation
- Alternative Versions: 2-3 variations testing different angles
- Rationale: brief explanation of why this approach works
- A/B Test Suggestions: what to test if running experiments
Quality Standards
- Every word must earn its place
- Specificity over vague claims
- Conversational tone, not corporate speak
- No hashtag spam
- Hook within first 5 words
- Clear CTA in every piece
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 1bfdb9fa8ade
copywriter is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihatesea69/kiro-kit (19 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 329 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
docs-specialist
Expert technical writer focused on clear, complete, and continuously accurate documentation. Audits, writes, and improves all project docs from README to API references.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
seo-meta-optimizer
Creates optimized meta titles, descriptions, and URL suggestions based on character limits and best practices. Generates compelling, keyword-rich metadata. Use PROACTIVELY for new content.
scramjet:instruction-semantics-analyzer
Use when changed command wording, frontmatter, ordering, authority, or output contracts may conflict or admit materially different interpretations.
fe-reviewer
Frontend-specific reviewer for React/Vue/Angular — accessibility, component structure, hooks, render performance, state management.
build-agent
File implementation and modification specialist.