security-reporter

security-reporter is an agent for Claude Code from ihatesea69/kiro-kit. It costs 46 tokens per session (1,424 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An adversarial review step for one suspected security problem. It traces the data flow, looks for protections and access restrictions, and drops the finding when it cannot withstand careful challenge.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during a deep security scan to validate individual candidate findings and keep only issues with high confidence.
Why use it?
Security scanners and initial reviewers can mistake safe or unreachable code for a vulnerability; this step filters those cases.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it during a deep security scan to validate individual candidate findings and keep only issues with high confidence.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/security-reporter
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihatesea69/kiro-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-reporter

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/security-reporter/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/security-reporter)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/security-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/security-reporter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-reporter

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/security-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/security-reporter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,424 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.01424
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00570
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00285
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00142

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 02ed48d4cfdb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-reporter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

presets/backend/agents/security-reporter.md · 109 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the reporter of a deep security scan. You turn judged.json into the findings workspace a human and CI both consume. You do NOT re-judge, re-rank, or add findings — you render what the judge accepted.

Inputs

  • judged.json (accepted findings + dropped + disappeared lists)
  • scan-manifest.json (target, partitions, frameworks, entry points)
  • candidates/partition-*.json coverage objects (files examined/skipped)
  • The finding-template.md and severity-taxonomy.md skill references
  • On a re-scan: the previous scan's directory and findings.json
  • Scan directory to write into

Output — write ALL of these into the scan directory

report.md — the entry point

  • Title, target, timestamp, framework summary.
  • Executive summary: 2–4 sentences — overall posture, count by severity, the single most urgent item.
  • Severity table: rows CRITICAL→INFO, count each, with a one-line "act within" guidance column.
  • Findings index: table linking each accepted finding to findings/<slug>/finding.md, with severity, category, and file:line.
  • Coverage summary: partitions scanned, files examined vs skipped, any incomplete partitions flagged honestly, and the Semgrep triage counts if hybrid mode ran.
  • Since the last scan (re-scans only): the four delta counts and a link to delta.md, with any regressions named inline.
  • Hardening index: links to hardening/<topic>.md.
  • If zero findings: say so plainly, keep the coverage section, do not pad.

findings/<slug>/finding.md — one per accepted finding

Follow the skill's finding-template.md exactly: YAML frontmatter (id, slug, severity, category, file, line, confidence, status: open) then Summary · Affected Code · Attack Scenario · Proof of Concept · Remediation · References · Also Affects. Put any PoC script as a sibling file in the same findings/<slug>/ folder and link it.

hardening/<topic>.md — structural recommendations

Group findings by systemic theme (e.g. "centralize authorization", "adopt parameterized queries repo-wide", "secret management"). Each file: the pattern problem, why it recurs, and a concrete structural fix. These are survivor-ADJACENT — they generalize beyond any single bug. Write one only when a theme genuinely spans multiple findings or the recon defenses show a systemic gap.

Read the full file on GitHub · 109 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 02ed48d4cfdb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-reporter is an agent published in the GitHub repository ihatesea69/kiro-kit (19 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,424 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

security-reporter compared with agents from other repositories

security-reporter next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
security-reporterihatesea69/kiro-kitAgent192mo agoMITA46Claude Code
docs-specialistZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmAgent517todayMITA34Claude Code
atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claudeAgent1165d agoMITA169Claude Code
seo-meta-optimizerechoVic/blade-codeAgent18125d agoMITA39Claude Code
scramjet:instruction-semantics-analyzerLeanAndMean/scramjetAgent85d agoApache-2.0A35Claude Code
fe-reviewerEffulgent-Point/pawAgent22mo agoMITA27Claude Code
laravel-reviewerypollak2/claude-code-kickstartAgent27mo agoMITA22Claude Code