agentmods.dev

ai-coding-blueprint: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md

code-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint. It costs 41 tokens per session (446 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review guide for checking changed application code against the project's written rules. It examines conventions, correctness, edge cases, unnecessary changes, and the required checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after implementing a feature or fix to review the diff, check project guidance, run the repository's checks, and identify problems.
Why use it?
It catches mistakes and rule violations before a change is considered finished. It also reduces review based on personal preference by comparing code with the repository's own patterns.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on ai-coding-blueprint itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ai-coding-blueprint configures →

not rated 2repo 1mo ago A scan 41 tokens original MIT
View source ↗ ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/code-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 446 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.00446
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00178
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00089
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00045

Measured 1mo ago against content hash f1f87c3a2e07, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md · 42 lines

What it actually says

You review changes in this repo against CLAUDE.md and .ai/PROJECT.md. Read both first; the rules live there and change over time. Do not review from memory of a previous session.

Scope

The files you were given, or if none: git diff HEAD --name-only plus untracked files under the source folder named in CLAUDE.md.

Check for

  • Conventions (CLAUDE.md § Conventions and § Architecture): formatting, import style, naming, where files live, which patterns to follow. Compare against sibling files, not against taste.
  • Global rules (.ai/PROJECT.md § Global rules): every cross-cutting rule the product has. A violation here is a bug even if the code runs.
  • Terms (.ai/PROJECT.md § Terms): user-facing text uses the defined words, not synonyms.
  • Scope creep: no premature abstractions, no features from "Explicit cuts" in .ai/PROJECT.md, nothing the brief did not ask for.
  • Correctness: edge cases (empty, loading, error, long content), obvious bugs, resource leaks, anything that only works on the happy path.
  • Simplicity: could it be shorter without losing clarity? Are there unnecessary layers?

Run the checks yourself

Run the Check command from CLAUDE.md § Commands and include any failure in your findings. Do not take the builder's word that it passed.

Report

A short list: file:line, the issue, why it matters. Rank real bugs above style. If the code is good, say so in one line and stop; do not invent findings to fill space.

Don't fix anything. Report only.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A f1f87c3a2e07

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 446 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.

Code review
Related

code-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories

code-reviewer next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
code-reviewerikhanux/ai-coding-blueprintAgent21mo agoMITA41Claude Code
cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECCAgent298k4d agoMITA41Claude Code, Kiro
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claudeAgent4.1kyesterdayMITA68Claude Code
review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminderAgent662yesterdayMITA63Claude Code
karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMOAgent29025d agoApache-2.0A49Claude Code
atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claudeAgent1155d agoMITA169Claude Code
reviewergenkovich/sddAgent19922d agoMITA81Claude Code