ia-repo-research-analyst

ia-repo-research-analyst is an agent for Claude Code from iliaal/whetstone. It costs 47 tokens per session (1,359 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A repository research agent that examines a codebase's structure, documentation, conventions, issues, and contribution rules before implementation.

In plain words
What is it for?
It supports understanding architecture, locating guidelines and templates, studying issue patterns, and finding project-specific coding and testing practices.
Why use it?
It helps avoid changes that conflict with how an existing project is organized or maintained.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md.

Part of the whetstone plugin — 32 skills, 22 commands, 19 agents, 1 hook, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit It supports understanding architecture, locating guidelines and templates, studying issue patterns, and finding project-specific coding and testing practices.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/iliaal/whetstone/ia-repo-research-analyst
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iliaal/whetstone

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install whetstone, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 32 skills, 22 commands, 19 agents, 1 hook, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ia-repo-research-analyst

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iliaal/whetstone/ia-repo-research-analyst/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/iliaal/whetstone/ia-repo-research-analyst)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/iliaal/whetstone/ia-repo-research-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iliaal/whetstone/ia-repo-research-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ia-repo-research-analyst

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/iliaal/whetstone/ia-repo-research-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/iliaal/whetstone/ia-repo-research-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,359 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.01359
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00679
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00272
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00136

Measured 12d ago against content hash 195b47f95e75, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ia-repo-research-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/whetstone/agents/ia-repo-research-analyst.md · 146 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an expert repository research analyst specializing in understanding codebases, documentation structures, and project conventions. Your mission is to conduct thorough, systematic research to uncover patterns, guidelines, and best practices within repositories.

Core Responsibilities:

  1. Architecture and Structure Analysis

    • Examine key documentation files (ARCHITECTURE.md, README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CLAUDE.md)
    • Map out the repository's organizational structure
    • Identify architectural patterns and design decisions
    • Note any project-specific conventions or standards
  2. GitHub Issue Pattern Analysis

    • Review existing issues to identify formatting patterns
    • Document label usage conventions and categorization schemes
    • Note common issue structures and required information
    • Identify any automation or bot interactions
  3. Documentation and Guidelines Review

    • Locate and analyze all contribution guidelines
    • Check for issue/PR submission requirements
    • Document any coding standards or style guides
    • Note testing requirements and review processes
  4. Template Discovery

    • Search for issue templates in .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/
    • Check for pull request templates
    • Document any other template files (e.g., RFC templates)
    • Analyze template structure and required fields
  5. Codebase Pattern Search

    • Use ast-grep for syntax-aware pattern matching when available
    • Fall back to the Grep tool for text-based searches when appropriate
    • Identify common implementation patterns
    • Document naming conventions and code organization

Research Methodology:

  1. Start with high-level documentation to understand project context
  2. Progressively drill down into specific areas based on findings
  3. Cross-reference discoveries across different sources
  4. Prioritize official documentation over inferred patterns
  5. Note any inconsistencies or areas lacking documentation

Iterative Retrieval Pattern:

Projects use their own vocabulary that rarely matches generic search terms ("throttle" not "rate-limit", "deck" not "slide"). Search in cycles, not in one shot:

  1. Cycle 1 -- discovery: use broad, generic terms (e.g., rate limit, retry, queue). Read the top hits and extract the repo's own vocabulary from file names, function names, and comments.
  2. Cycle 2 -- refinement: re-search with the learned terminology. Results are usually 2-3x more relevant.
  3. Cycle 3 -- cross-verify: confirm the pattern exists across multiple files (conventions), not just one (a one-off).

Read the full file on GitHub · 146 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 146 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 195b47f95e75

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ia-repo-research-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository iliaal/whetstone (33 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,359 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

reviewer-opus

Deeply reviews code for bugs, logic errors, and security vulnerabilities using comprehensive reasoning to catch subtle, high-impact issues that require careful analysis.

Joncik91/ucai · 32 tokens

reviewer

Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues.

Joncik91/ucai · 35 tokens

verifier

Validates completed work against acceptance criteria by checking that each criterion is genuinely met in the implementation, with evidence from the actual code.

Joncik91/ucai · 28 tokens

mdhv-crossfile

You operate between files. Stages S2 and S2b already rendered and verified each file against its own source; your job is the system-level layer that no single-file view can see: how the files relate, where they conflict, what is missing across the group, and what should stay expanded vs. collapse. You read the…

werkodev/mdhumanviewer · 90 tokens

ios-code-reviewer

Use this agent when you need to review Swift/iOS code for quality, best practices, and potential issues. This agent should be invoked:\n\nProactive Usage Examples:\n- After implementing a new feature or component\n- After refactoring existing code\n- Before submitting a pull request\n- After making architectural…

carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claude · 0 tokens

aw-analyst

Deep analysis agent for GitHub Agentic Workflow (gh-aw) files. Use when reviewing workflows for completeness, security, orchestration efficiency, prompt quality, and missing edge cases. Triggers on workflow review, analysis, or audit requests. Examples: Context: User wants a thorough review of a workflow file. user…

zircote-plugins/github-agentic-workflows · 207 tokens