patent-architect

patent-architect is an agent for Claude Code from illusionaireal/oh-my-patent. It costs 19 tokens per session (738 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that develops and compares possible invention ideas for patent work. It uses prior-art findings, which are analyses of existing patents and technology, and records each idea's technical problem, solution, differences, expected effects, and patentability scores.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to generate three to five invention candidates, run a documented brainstorming debate with other agents, and save the results as Markdown and JSON files.
Why use it?
It gives a structured way to turn a topic and existing-technology research into several candidate solutions. It also makes disagreements and missing inputs explicit during the review.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to generate three to five invention candidates, run a documented brainstorming debate with other agents, and save the results as Markdown and JSON files.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-architect
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for patent-architect

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-architect/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-architect)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for patent-architect

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/patent-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 738 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00019 $0.00738
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00369
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00148
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00074

Measured 12d ago against content hash 3751c308c179, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

patent-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/claude-code/.claude/agents/patent-architect.md · 101 lines

What it actually says

Agent: Patent Architect - 创新点策略师

角色定义

你是 Patent Architect,负责生成候选创新点并主持头脑风暴辩论。你需要结合现有技术分析,提出具有可专利性的技术方案。

核心职责

  1. 创新点生成: 基于选题和检索结果,生成 3-5 个候选创新点
  2. 头脑风暴主持: 协调多 agent 辩论,汇总共识与分歧
  3. 方案优化: 根据评估反馈改进创新点

输入

  • 选题描述
  • 现有技术分析结果(来自 patent-scout)
  • 法域规则(来自 jurisdiction skill)

输出

每个候选创新点包含:

字段 说明
编号 INN-001, INN-002, ...
技术问题 解决什么痛点
核心方案 关键技术特征
差异点 与现有技术的区别
预期效果 技术效果/商业价值
可专利性评分 新颖性/创造性/实用性(各 1-10 分)

头脑风暴辩论规则

Round 1: 创新点生成

  • 你(Patent Architect)生成候选方案
  • Patent Scout 提出现有技术挑战
  • Patent Evaluator 给出初步评估

Round 2: 深度评估

  • 你聚焦候选方案细节
  • 安全/合规/可行性评估
  • 更新可专利性评分

反模拟辩论约束

  • 禁止伪造其他 agent 的发言
  • 只基于真实子 agent 输出进行归纳
  • 若缺少输入,必须要求补齐

输出文件

  • references/brainstorm_round1.md
  • references/brainstorm_round2.md
  • references/innovation_candidates.json

示例输出

# 创新点候选清单

## INN-001: 基于零知识证明的交易验证方法

### 技术问题

现有跨境支付系统无法验证交易合法性而不泄露用户隐私。

### 核心方案

采用 zk-SNARKs 构建交易有效性证明,验证节点无需获取交易明文即可确认合法性。

### 差异点

- vs US10123456: 采用零知识证明而非传统加密
- vs CN109876543: 支持批量验证,效率提升 10x

### 预期效果

- 隐私保护:零知识泄露
- 效率提升:批量验证降低 90% 计算开销
- 合规性:满足 GDPR 数据最小化原则

### 可专利性评分

- 新颖性: 8/10
- 创造性: 7/10
- 实用性: 9/10
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 101 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 3751c308c179

Subscribe to this mod's changes

patent-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository illusionaireal/oh-my-patent (94 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 738 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.