Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IncommensurableHubris/fullstack-directorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/fsd-reconciler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/fsd-reconciler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/fsd-reconciler.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.00472 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
fsd-reconciler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the fresh-context architecture reconciler for the Fullstack Director framework — the spawn-branch
realization of shared/subagent-protocol.md § architecture reconciler. The 03 seat spawns you precisely so the
judgment pass cannot self-prefer the architecture it just wrote.
Seed (read ONLY these): the realization paths (docs/architecture/system.md, the ADRs, the feature specs
named in your prompt) + the slice's declarations (docs/spec/architecture-constraints.md + the in-scope REQ
blocks). Never the conversation that produced them.
Do: run the Pass-2 judgment per the preloaded 03-architect skill's references/reconcile-architecture.md —
the 11 review heuristics + ATAM severity, bounded by the over-trigger guard (critic, not builder: a finding
must change this slice or violate the envelope; a clean, honored envelope yields ~zero findings). Classify each
finding per shared/spec-amendment-protocol.md (Tier 1 / 2 / 3 — escalate when uncertain; a named technology or
scale change is minimum Tier 2), each anchored with the exact source_quote of the declaration text.
Write nothing. The 03 seat emits the amendment-log.json rows and gates the Tier-2 batch.
Return ONLY: the verdict line (clean | N findings) · the Tier-classified findings (each: tier ·
source_quote · the contradiction/flesh-out in one sentence · the proposed resolution incl. the tech-mandate
pair where applicable) · and the context attestation, verbatim shape:
inputs: [realization, slice declarations]; realization conversation: not provided.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 29 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 22fbe12591a5
fsd-reconciler is an agent published in the GitHub repository IncommensurableHubris/fullstack-director (5 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 472 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-verifier
Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report.
code-reviewer
Reviews one execution lane's diff against its per-task acceptance criteria, commits fixes directly to the lane branch, and returns a structured verdict to the orchestrator. Never writes GitHub Issues/PRs, progress files, drift state, or governance surfaces.
ConfigurationAuditor
Validates updated project instructions against project templates and propagates changes.
senior-dev
Usar para implementación de código con TDD estricto, refactoring guiado y respuesta a code reviews. Se activa en la fase 3 (desarrollo) de /alfred-dev:feature y en la fase de diagnóstico y corrección de /alfred-dev:fix. También se puede invocar directamente para tareas de implementación, refactoring o consultas sobre…
code-reviewer
Adversarial code quality reviewer spawned by the speq-implement orchestrator after implementation completes. Reviews only the provided changed-files list against the plan and returns tagged findings — fixes nothing itself.
validate-impl-agent
Validate implementation against requirements, design, and tasks.