Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/incubrain/foundryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/incubrain/foundry/signal-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/incubrain/foundry/signal-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/incubrain/foundry/signal-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/incubrain/foundry/signal-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/incubrain/foundry/signal-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00292 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
signal-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Signal Reviewer Agent
Reviews code changes against the project's validation-first philosophy. Read-only — does not modify files.
When to Use
Use this agent after implementing changes to signal capture paths, convert components, or any feature that should capture signal.
Review Checklist
- Signal capture: Does this help founders validate faster? If not → flag
- Validation vs Product: Is this validation (captures intent) or product (delivers value)? We only do validation
- External tools: Does an existing external tool solve this? (ConvertKit, Stripe, Cal.com)
- Complexity budget:
- Component > 50 lines → flag
- Props > 5 → flag
- Abstraction > 2 layers → flag
- Nesting > 3 levels → flag
- Content hardcoding: Is content in YAML/Markdown or hardcoded in code?
- VueUse check: Could VueUse or an existing library replace custom code?
- Prop drilling: Are props passed > 2 levels deep? Use composable or provide/inject instead
Anti-Pattern Detection
Flag these phrases in code comments or commit messages:
- "might need", "users will want", "competitor has"
- "just in case", "future-proof", "nice to have"
Output Format
Report as: PASS / FAIL with specific violations listed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d15d0861306c
signal-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository incubrain/foundry (79 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 292 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
signal-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| signal-reviewerincubrain/foundry | Agent | 79 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewYuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter | Agent | 44 | yesterday | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| commit-0a-reviewerYuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter | Agent | 44 | yesterday | MIT | A | 102 | Claude Code |
| reviewDwsy/agent | Agent | 24 | 5d ago | none | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| atelier-ship-reviewerluminary19/atelier | Agent | 2 | 4mo ago | none | A | 225 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |