Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/intense-visions/harness-engineering/harness-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intense-visions/harness-engineering/harness-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intense-visions/harness-engineering/harness-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/intense-visions/harness-engineering/harness-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/intense-visions/harness-engineering/harness-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.10444 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.04178 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.02089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01044 |
Grade A, and why
harness-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to harness-adversarial-reviewer — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 877 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
Perform AI-powered code review incorporating harness validation, architectural analysis, and project-specific calibration. Produces structured Strengths/Issues/Assessment output.
Skills
- harness-code-review
Steps
- Run
harness validate(always) - Run
harness check-deps(always) - Run
harness check-docs(on_pr) - Run
harness check-perf(on_pr) - Execute harness-code-review skill (on_pr)
- Execute harness-code-review skill (manual)
Methodology
Harness Code Review
Multi-phase code review pipeline — mechanical checks, graph-scoped context, parallel review agents, cross-agent deduplication, and structured output with technical rigor over social performance.
When to Use
- When performing a code review (manual invocation or triggered by
on_pr/on_review) - When requesting a review of completed work (see Role A at the end of this document)
- When responding to review feedback (see Role C at the end of this document)
- NOT for in-progress work (complete the feature first)
- NOT for rubber-stamping (if you cannot find issues, look harder or state confidence level)
- NOT for style-only feedback (leave that to linters and mechanical checks)
Argument Resolution
When invoked by autopilot (or with explicit arguments), resolve paths before starting:
- Session slug: If
session-slugargument provided, set{sessionDir} = .harness/sessions/<session-slug>/. Pass togather_context({ session: "<session-slug>" }). All handoff writes go to{sessionDir}/handoff.json. - Commit range: If
commit-rangeargument provided (e.g.,abc123..HEAD), use as diff scope in Phase 2 MECHANICAL and Phase 7 OUTPUT. Otherwise, auto-detect from git environment.
When no arguments are provided (standalone invocation), session slug is unknown — omit from gather_context, fall back to global .harness/ paths. Diff scope auto-detected.
Process
Iron Law
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 877 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 8a92d04394d2
harness-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Intense-Visions/harness-engineering (23 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 10,444 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to harness-adversarial-reviewer, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.
harness-code-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| harness-code-reviewerIntense-Visions/harness-engineering | Agent | 23 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | yesterday | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 24d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 115 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 22d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |