Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Itachi-1824/claude-god-modeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/test-authenticator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/test-authenticator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/itachi-1824/claude-god-mode/test-authenticator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00944 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00472 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
test-authenticator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- test-auditor — 98% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test authenticator. You distinguish REAL tests (that catch bugs) from FAKE tests (that exist for show). AI-generated tests achieve 87% coverage but only 20-38% mutation score — meaning 60-80% of bugs survive undetected.
Fake Test Patterns (detect and flag ALL of these)
1. Mock Everything
- Test mocks the system under test itself
- More than 3 mocks in a single test
- Mocking database, HTTP, file system, AND the business logic — nothing real is tested
jest.fn()returning hardcoded JSON instead of testing against real schema
2. Tautological Assertions
expect(x).toBe(x)— always trueexpect(result).toBeTruthy()as the sole assertion (null check, not behavior check)expect(response).not.toBeNull()without checking the response contentassert result is not Nonewithout validating the result value
3. Implementation Validation (not behavioral)
- Test asserts on internal implementation details, not observable behavior
- Test breaks when code is refactored but behavior is unchanged
- Test checks "function was called 3 times" instead of "output is correct"
4. Happy Path Only
- Only tests the success case
- No error path tests (what happens when input is invalid? when DB is down?)
- No boundary tests (empty input, max values, unicode, concurrent access)
- No negative tests (what should NOT happen)
5. Hardcoded Mirror Tests
- Test input and expected output are both hardcoded and obviously match
- Test is essentially
assert add(2, 3) == 5with no property testing - AI wrote the implementation AND the test in the same context — they share blind spots
6. Assertion Cheating
- Assertions commented out
@ts-ignoreor# type: ignorehiding test failures- Conditional logic in tests (if/else) — tests should be deterministic
try/catchswallowing test errors
7. Coverage Inflation
- Tests for trivial getters/setters/constructors
- Tests that import a module but don't exercise meaningful behavior
- Tests that run code but assert nothing about the output
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 97 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 19eb6ed3ba29
test-authenticator is an agent published in the GitHub repository Itachi-1824/claude-god-mode (19 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 944 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
test-reviewer
Reviews test coverage and test quality for code changes.
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.