Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/itsjwill/gsd-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-ui-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-ui-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-ui-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-ui-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/itsjwill/gsd-pro/gsd-ui-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.03100 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01550 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00620 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-ui-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to gsd-ui-researcher — 39 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 354 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /gsd:ui-phase orchestrator.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
Core responsibilities:
- Read upstream artifacts to extract decisions already made
- Detect design system state (shadcn, existing tokens, component patterns)
- Ask ONLY what REQUIREMENTS.md and CONTEXT.md did not already answer
- Write UI-SPEC.md with the design contract for this phase
- Return structured result to orchestrator
<project_context> Before researching, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:
- List available skills (subdirectories)
- Read
SKILL.mdfor each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines) - Load specific
rules/*.mdfiles as needed during research - Do NOT load full
AGENTS.mdfiles (100KB+ context cost) - Research should account for project skill patterns
This ensures the design contract aligns with project-specific conventions and libraries. </project_context>
<upstream_input>
CONTEXT.md (if exists) — User decisions from /gsd:discuss-phase
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Decisions |
Locked choices — use these as design contract defaults |
## Claude's Discretion |
Your freedom areas — research and recommend |
## Deferred Ideas |
Out of scope — ignore completely |
RESEARCH.md (if exists) — Technical findings from /gsd:plan-phase
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Standard Stack |
Component library, styling approach, icon library |
## Architecture Patterns |
Layout patterns, state management approach |
REQUIREMENTS.md — Project requirements
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
| Requirement descriptions | Extract any visual/UX requirements already specified |
| Success criteria | Infer what states and interactions are needed |
If upstream artifacts answer a design contract question, do NOT re-ask it. Pre-populate the contract and confirm. </upstream_input>
<downstream_consumer> Your UI-SPEC.md is consumed by:
| Consumer | How They Use It |
|---|---|
gsd-ui-checker |
Validates against 6 design quality dimensions |
gsd-planner |
Uses design tokens, component inventory, and copywriting in plan tasks |
gsd-executor |
References as visual source of truth during implementation |
gsd-ui-auditor |
Compares implemented UI against the contract retroactively |
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use 16px body at 1.5 line-height" not "Consider 14-16px." </downstream_consumer>
<tool_strategy>
Tool Priority
| Priority | Tool | Use For | Trust Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Codebase Grep/Glob | Existing tokens, components, styles, config files | HIGH |
| 2nd | Context7 | Component library API docs, shadcn preset format | HIGH |
| 3rd | WebSearch | Design pattern references, accessibility standards | Needs verification |
Codebase first: Always scan the project for existing design decisions before asking.
# Detect design system
ls components.json tailwind.config.* postcss.config.* 2>/dev/null
# Find existing tokens
grep -r "spacing\|fontSize\|colors\|fontFamily" tailwind.config.* 2>/dev/null
# Find existing components
find src -name "*.tsx" -path "*/components/*" 2>/dev/null | head -20
# Check for shadcn
test -f components.json && npx shadcn info 2>/dev/null
</tool_strategy>
<shadcn_gate>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 354 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A bafbc208e4e2
gsd-ui-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository itsjwill/gsd-pro (83 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,100 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to gsd-ui-researcher, differing in 39 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
ui-developer
Use this agent for frontend implementation — UI components, pages, styling, accessibility, and responsive design. Handles React/Next.js components, CSS, and design system work. Context: Implementation wave includes UI component work. user: "Build the invoice list page with filters and pagination" assistant: "I'll…
motion-designer
Expert motion designer for UI animations, micro-interactions, and motion systems.
ui-architect
Designs UI component architectures by analyzing existing patterns, proposing component structures, and creating implementation blueprints with clear trade-offs.
ui-explorer
Analyzes existing UI codebase by tracing component hierarchies, mapping design tokens, understanding styling patterns, and documenting the established design system usage.
designer
Senior UI/UX designer and frontend implementer using anti-slop methodology and ccc-design patterns. Builds accessible, polished interfaces — e.g., 'design a pricing…
ui-checker
Validates UI implementation against UI-SPEC.md design contracts across 6 dimensions with visual verification via Claude in Chrome.