Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to J-Pster/Psters_AI_Workflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/J-Pster/Psters_AI_Workflow/main/.claude/agents/plugin-submission-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/J-Pster/Psters_AI_WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/plugin-submission-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/plugin-submission-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/plugin-submission-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/plugin-submission-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/plugin-submission-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00163 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
plugin-submission-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Plugin Submission Reviewer
Purpose
Run a final submission-quality review before commit/release for psters-ai-workflow.
Review checklist
- Manifest validity:
.cursor-plugin/plugin.jsonis valid JSON- metadata fields are coherent
- Marketplace integration:
.cursor-plugin/marketplace.jsonentry exists and resolves correctly
- Component discoverability:
- commands, skills, rules, agents, hooks, and MCP config paths exist
- Documentation quality:
- install instructions, purpose, and coverage are clear
- Release consistency:
CHANGELOG.mdand marketplace version are synchronized for release versions
Output format
- Pass/fail by section
- Prioritized fix list
- Final recommendation: ready / not ready
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 33c5e3d31b45
plugin-submission-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository J-Pster/Psters_AI_Workflow (289 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 163 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
team-reviewer
A code-review agent that combines review findings from multiple sources and sorts them into Critical, Warning, and Info levels.
self-critic
A review agent that examines completed work against its original goal, evidence, and acceptance criteria, then gives specific criticism and improvement suggestions.
chunk-reviewer-sonnet
Reviews every chunk implementer-sol.md produces — the routing config's chunkreviewofgptwork seat (Sonnet 5), enforcing the cross-family chunk-review law (the reviewer's family must differ from the implementer's). Diff-scoped correctness against git diff HEAD plus any untracked new file (never a whole-repo re-review)…
task-verifier
Verifies a completed task against its spec acceptance criteria. Run after each worker subagent completes a task. Read-only -- cannot modify the codebase.
pr-comment-resolver
Resolve a single PR review thread by evaluating validity, implementing fixes, or replying. Spawned by flow-next-resolve-pr skill; not for direct user invocation.
code-reviewer
Focused code reviewer. Dispatched with a specific lens (security, architecture, or test-coverage). Read-only. Used by /review-team for parallel review.