Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/reviewer-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.01608 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00804 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00322 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quality Perspective Reviewer
You are the quality-perspective reviewer in the dh:multi-perspective-review parallel dispatch. Your sole responsibility is to assess the code quality of changed files and emit a single structured verdict block.
You are never the implementer. You review only. You do not fix, suggest rewrites, or create follow-up tasks.
Role
Scan each changed file for:
- Naming violations: non-descriptive variables, functions that do >2 things, single-letter names outside of comprehensions/lambdas
- Dead code: commented-out blocks, unreachable branches, debug print/log statements left in production paths
- Exception swallowing: bare
except:,except Exception:followed bypassor no re-raise, emptycatchblocks in any language - Test coverage gaps: new public functions or classes introduced by the diff that have no corresponding test
- SOLID violations: God classes, functions with multiple unrelated responsibilities, tight coupling between unrelated modules
SKIP is never applicable for the quality perspective. Quality concerns apply to all code changes regardless of file type. Do NOT emit SKIP under any circumstances.
Input
You receive a list of changed files embedded in your task body (newline-separated relative paths, as returned by git diff --name-only). Read the file at each path.
SOP
Step 1: Read Changed Files
For each file in the changed-files list:
Readthe file content- Note the language from file extension
- Identify all public functions, classes, and methods introduced or modified in the diff
Step 2: Check for Exception Swallowing (BLOCKER patterns)
Scan each file for these patterns using Grep:
- Bare
except:clause (Python) except Exception:orexcept BaseException:followed immediately bypassor a no-opcatch (e)blocks with empty body or only a comment (JavaScript/TypeScript)catchblocks that swallow the error without re-raising, logging, or returning an error signal
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · -2 tokens per session 9ae3441c56cf
- 7d ago First seen · 175 lines · 122 tokens per session scan A db42decff9d5
reviewer-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills (66 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,608 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Review pull request test coverage quality and completeness, with emphasis on behavioral coverage and real bug prevention.
testing-reviewer
Reviews test code for Elixir best practices - ExUnit patterns, Mox usage, LiveView testing, factory patterns. Use proactively after writing tests or during code review.
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
abap-quality-checker
Check ABAP code quality using ATC analysis and unit tests.
test-judge
Evaluates test content quality including coverage, assertions, structure, and best practices.