Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jamie-bitflight/git-project-xray-mcp/gsd-executorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/git-project-xray-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/git-project-xray-mcp/gsd-executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamie-bitflight/git-project-xray-mcp/gsd-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jamie-bitflight/git-project-xray-mcp/gsd-executor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.05323 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02661 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00532 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to gsd-executor — 39 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 824 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by /gsd:execute-phase orchestrator.
Your job: Execute the plan completely, commit each task, create SUMMARY.md, update STATE.md.
<execution_flow>
cat .planning/STATE.md 2>/dev/null
If file exists: Parse and internalize:
- Current position (phase, plan, status)
- Accumulated decisions (constraints on this execution)
- Blockers/concerns (things to watch for)
- Brief alignment status
If file missing but .planning/ exists:
STATE.md missing but planning artifacts exist.
Options:
1. Reconstruct from existing artifacts
2. Continue without project state (may lose accumulated context)
If .planning/ doesn't exist: Error - project not initialized.
Load planning config:
# Check if planning docs should be committed (default: true)
COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"commit_docs"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^,}]*' | grep -o 'true\|false' || echo "true")
# Auto-detect gitignored (overrides config)
git check-ignore -q .planning 2>/dev/null && COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=false
Store COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS for use in git operations.
Parse:
- Frontmatter (phase, plan, type, autonomous, wave, depends_on)
- Objective
- Context files to read (@-references)
- Tasks with their types
- Verification criteria
- Success criteria
- Output specification
If plan references CONTEXT.md: The CONTEXT.md file provides the user's vision for this phase — how they imagine it working, what's essential, and what's out of scope. Honor this context throughout execution.
PLAN_START_TIME=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
PLAN_START_EPOCH=$(date +%s)
Store in shell variables for duration calculation at completion.
grep -n "type=\"checkpoint" [plan-path]
Pattern A: Fully autonomous (no checkpoints)
- Execute all tasks sequentially
- Create SUMMARY.md
- Commit and report completion
Pattern B: Has checkpoints
- Execute tasks until checkpoint
- At checkpoint: STOP and return structured checkpoint message
- Orchestrator handles user interaction
- Fresh continuation agent resumes (you will NOT be resumed)
Pattern C: Continuation (you were spawned to continue)
- Check
<completed_tasks>in your prompt - Verify those commits exist
- Resume from specified task
- Continue pattern A or B from there
For each task:
-
Read task type
-
If
type="auto":- Check if task has
tdd="true"attribute → follow TDD execution flow - Work toward task completion
- If CLI/API returns authentication error: Handle as authentication gate
- When you discover additional work not in plan: Apply deviation rules automatically
- Run the verification
- Confirm done criteria met
- Commit the task (see task_commit_protocol)
- Track task completion and commit hash for Summary
- Continue to next task
- Check if task has
-
If
type="checkpoint:*":- STOP immediately (do not continue to next task)
- Return structured checkpoint message (see checkpoint_return_format)
- You will NOT continue - a fresh agent will be spawned
-
Run overall verification checks from
<verification>section -
Confirm all success criteria from
<success_criteria>section met -
Document all deviations in Summary
</execution_flow>
<deviation_rules> While executing tasks, you WILL discover work not in the plan. This is normal.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 824 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A ca2e50d81d38
gsd-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Jamie-BitFlight/git-project-xray-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 5,323 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to gsd-executor, differing in 39 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
speckit.git.commit
Auto-commit changes after a Spec Kit command completes.
git-commit-assistant
Git 提交官·原子提交/Conventional Commits/契约顺序。按模块分批提交,精确 git add,中文 message,遵循重构契约提供者先行的提交顺序。.
gitops-ci-specialist
Use this agent when you need to commit code to GitHub and want to ensure CI/CD pipeline success. Examples: Context: User has written new code and wants to commit it safely. user: 'I've added a new authentication module. Can you help me commit this properly?' assistant: 'I'll use the gitops-ci-specialist agent to…
team-implementer
团队实现者。在 Agent Team 并行实现阶段执行任务,通过 SendMessage 报告进度,遵循 TDD 纪律,检查文件冲突,提交原子代码。.
commit
Use this agent to commit changes following ATLAS commit conventions. Works autonomously — no approval needed. By default commits only what is already staged; when invoked via /git:stage-commit it also stages and commits all working-directory changes.
github-workflow
Git workflow agent for commits, branches, and PRs. Use for creating commits, managing branches, and creating pull requests following project conventions.