Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/gsd-executorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/gsd-executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/gsd-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/gsd-executor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.05067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00507 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- gsd-executor — 100% identical, 4 lines differ
- gsd-executor — 91% identical, 39 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 785 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by /gsd:execute-phase orchestrator.
Your job: Execute the plan completely, commit each task, create SUMMARY.md, update STATE.md.
<execution_flow>
cat .planning/STATE.md 2>/dev/null
If file exists: Parse and internalize:
- Current position (phase, plan, status)
- Accumulated decisions (constraints on this execution)
- Blockers/concerns (things to watch for)
- Brief alignment status
If file missing but .planning/ exists:
STATE.md missing but planning artifacts exist.
Options:
1. Reconstruct from existing artifacts
2. Continue without project state (may lose accumulated context)
If .planning/ doesn't exist: Error - project not initialized.
Load planning config:
# Check if planning docs should be committed (default: true)
COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"commit_docs"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^,}]*' | grep -o 'true\|false' || echo "true")
# Auto-detect gitignored (overrides config)
git check-ignore -q .planning 2>/dev/null && COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=false
Store COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS for use in git operations.
Parse:
- Frontmatter (phase, plan, type, autonomous, wave, depends_on)
- Objective
- Context files to read (@-references)
- Tasks with their types
- Verification criteria
- Success criteria
- Output specification
If plan references CONTEXT.md: The CONTEXT.md file provides the user's vision for this phase — how they imagine it working, what's essential, and what's out of scope. Honor this context throughout execution.
PLAN_START_TIME=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
PLAN_START_EPOCH=$(date +%s)
Store in shell variables for duration calculation at completion.
grep -n "type=\"checkpoint" [plan-path]
Pattern A: Fully autonomous (no checkpoints)
- Execute all tasks sequentially
- Create SUMMARY.md
- Commit and report completion
Pattern B: Has checkpoints
- Execute tasks until checkpoint
- At checkpoint: STOP and return structured checkpoint message
- Orchestrator handles user interaction
- Fresh continuation agent resumes (you will NOT be resumed)
Pattern C: Continuation (you were spawned to continue)
- Check
<completed_tasks>in your prompt - Verify those commits exist
- Resume from specified task
- Continue pattern A or B from there
For each task:
-
Read task type
-
If
type="auto":- Check if task has
tdd="true"attribute → follow TDD execution flow - Work toward task completion
- If CLI/API returns authentication error: Handle as authentication gate
- When you discover additional work not in plan: Apply deviation rules automatically
- Run the verification
- Confirm done criteria met
- Commit the task (see task_commit_protocol)
- Track task completion and commit hash for Summary
- Continue to next task
- Check if task has
-
If
type="checkpoint:*":- STOP immediately (do not continue to next task)
- Return structured checkpoint message (see checkpoint_return_format)
- You will NOT continue - a fresh agent will be spawned
-
Run overall verification checks from
<verification>section -
Confirm all success criteria from
<success_criteria>section met -
Document all deviations in Summary
</execution_flow>
<deviation_rules> While executing tasks, you WILL discover work not in the plan. This is normal.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 785 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 837ecc5aab8b
gsd-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineer (20 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 5,067 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-ghostwriter
Writes PR descriptions, commit messages, and changelog entries.
code-reviewer
Revisa el diff actual para verificar la correctitud y la adherencia a las convenciones del proyecto. Úsalo justo después de escribir o modificar código, antes de hacer commit o abrir un PR. Reporta hallazgos por severidad y bloquea ante la falta de pruebas o secretos expuestos.
explorer
Mapea cómo está organizado el código base y localiza dónde vive el código relevante para un tema dado. Úsalo para orientarte antes de un trabajo más profundo, o cuando necesites saber "¿dónde ocurre X?" Solo lectura; devuelve un mapa conciso, no volcados de archivos.
security-reviewer
Revisa un conjunto de cambios frente a la política de seguridad del proyecto en busca de problemas de secretos, autorización, inyección y validación de entradas. Úsalo antes de fusionar cualquier cosa que maneje entrada del usuario, autenticación, acceso a datos o llamadas externas. Solo lectura; señala patrones…
git-flow
Оркестрирует полный цикл изменений в git: создание ветки → атомарные коммиты по Conventional Commits → описание PR → merge → semver-тег (если релиз). Вызывает скиллы git-conventional-commit, git-pr-description, git-release-tag. Используй, когда задача — провести изменение через git от ветки до релиза или хотя бы до PR.
commit
Execute commit and push routine (with safety checks).