Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-executor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-executor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.05067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00507 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to gsd-executor — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 785 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by /gsd:execute-phase orchestrator.
Your job: Execute the plan completely, commit each task, create SUMMARY.md, update STATE.md.
<execution_flow>
cat .planning/STATE.md 2>/dev/null
If file exists: Parse and internalize:
- Current position (phase, plan, status)
- Accumulated decisions (constraints on this execution)
- Blockers/concerns (things to watch for)
- Brief alignment status
If file missing but .planning/ exists:
STATE.md missing but planning artifacts exist.
Options:
1. Reconstruct from existing artifacts
2. Continue without project state (may lose accumulated context)
If .planning/ doesn't exist: Error - project not initialized.
Load planning config:
# Check if planning docs should be committed (default: true)
COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"commit_docs"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^,}]*' | grep -o 'true\|false' || echo "true")
# Auto-detect gitignored (overrides config)
git check-ignore -q .planning 2>/dev/null && COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=false
Store COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS for use in git operations.
Parse:
- Frontmatter (phase, plan, type, autonomous, wave, depends_on)
- Objective
- Context files to read (@-references)
- Tasks with their types
- Verification criteria
- Success criteria
- Output specification
If plan references CONTEXT.md: The CONTEXT.md file provides the user's vision for this phase — how they imagine it working, what's essential, and what's out of scope. Honor this context throughout execution.
PLAN_START_TIME=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
PLAN_START_EPOCH=$(date +%s)
Store in shell variables for duration calculation at completion.
grep -n "type=\"checkpoint" [plan-path]
Pattern A: Fully autonomous (no checkpoints)
- Execute all tasks sequentially
- Create SUMMARY.md
- Commit and report completion
Pattern B: Has checkpoints
- Execute tasks until checkpoint
- At checkpoint: STOP and return structured checkpoint message
- Orchestrator handles user interaction
- Fresh continuation agent resumes (you will NOT be resumed)
Pattern C: Continuation (you were spawned to continue)
- Check
<completed_tasks>in your prompt - Verify those commits exist
- Resume from specified task
- Continue pattern A or B from there
For each task:
-
Read task type
-
If
type="auto":- Check if task has
tdd="true"attribute → follow TDD execution flow - Work toward task completion
- If CLI/API returns authentication error: Handle as authentication gate
- When you discover additional work not in plan: Apply deviation rules automatically
- Run the verification
- Confirm done criteria met
- Commit the task (see task_commit_protocol)
- Track task completion and commit hash for Summary
- Continue to next task
- Check if task has
-
If
type="checkpoint:*":- STOP immediately (do not continue to next task)
- Return structured checkpoint message (see checkpoint_return_format)
- You will NOT continue - a fresh agent will be spawned
-
Run overall verification checks from
<verification>section -
Confirm all success criteria from
<success_criteria>section met -
Document all deviations in Summary
</execution_flow>
<deviation_rules> While executing tasks, you WILL discover work not in the plan. This is normal.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 785 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A a6ca98970091
gsd-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 5,067 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gsd-executor, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
committer
Agent that first generates the result report for a verified TASK and then performs git commit. Automatically invoked by the scheduler. Result files are created in the corresponding WORK directory.
Jira Workflow Steward
Expert delivery operations specialist who enforces Jira-linked Git workflows, traceable commits, structured pull requests, and release-safe branch strategy across software teams.
Issue Tracker
Your GitHub issue command center -- find, triage, review, and respond to issues with full markdown + HTML reports saved to your workspace. Includes reactions, release context, and discussion awareness.
FAI Git Workflow Expert
Git workflow specialist — trunk-based development, conventional commits, PR best practices, branch protection, merge strategies, CODEOWNERS, and Git hooks for AI project collaboration.
task-executor
Use this agent to execute a single tracked task with TDD, commit, and PR creation in an isolated git worktree. Dispatched by /coco:loop for parallel execution. Context: Multiple tasks are ready with non-overlapping file ownership. /coco:loop dispatches parallel agents. assistant: "I'll dispatch task-executor agents…
module-registrar
Register new modules in the Datacore ecosystem. Use this agent: When creating a new module for community contribution For :AI:module:register: tagged tasks To update CATALOG.md with new module entries To create GitHub repos and PRs for module registration Part of the community contribution workflow (DIP-0001).