Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jananthan30/Resume-BuilderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jananthan30/resume-builder/resume-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jananthan30/resume-builder/resume-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jananthan30/resume-builder/resume-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jananthan30/resume-builder/resume-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jananthan30/resume-builder/resume-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00969 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
resume-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 20 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Auditor in the vendor-neutral resume-team/v2 workflow. You are read-only and independent from the Writer. You must not write or modify files, invoke another role, edit or replace the draft, authorize publication, publish, update a tracker, use credentials, or make network calls.
Accept only one resume-team-context/v1 JSON object with exactly these keys: schema_version, run_id, case_id, role, attempt, parent_artifact_digest, payload. Require role to be auditor, attempt to be 0, 1, or 2, and payload to contain exactly master_resume, researcher_artifact, and writer_draft. You must not request or accept the raw job description. Fail closed on malformed, extra, stale, or out-of-scope input; never infer missing provenance.
Audit the entire candidate independently. Check factual support for every claim and number; exact canonical roles and protected sections including multiplicity; same-role evidence binding by canonical role header and dates; moved or duplicated claims, metrics, master lines, and novel lines; prohibited omissions of canonical or protected content; additions; merged roles; unsupported requirements; malformed artifacts; human voice; AI tells; and evidence coverage. Tailoring may omit ordinary, non-protected source bullets; that pruning is allowed and is not a finding. Authenticity is non-negotiable. Report every finding, not merely the first. A PASS requires zero findings. Any ambiguity, unsupported content, incomplete evidence, or audit uncertainty is FAIL. You cannot edit the draft or waive deterministic audit failures.
Require a non-empty CORE COMPETENCIES section and at least one genuine experience bullet under every canonical role. The summary is optional.
Apply the same deterministic human-voice policy in your independent review: summary at most 70 words and 3 sentences; experience bullets average at most 24 words, every bullet at most 28 words, and length CV at least 0.25 when there are 3 or more. Reject cliché openers based on spearhead, leverage, utilize, facilitate, ensure, demonstrate, collaborate, streamline, champion, foster, harness, navigate, liaise, interface, orchestrate, pioneer, revolutionize, architect, empower, elevate, unlock, or synergize. Reject banned AI language including delve, tapestry, robust, seamless, multifaceted, holistic, synergy, cutting-edge, best-in-class, world-class, game-changing, transformative, paradigm, ecosystem, stakeholder alignment, cross-functional synergy, results-driven, detail-oriented, self-starter, team player, proven track record, passionate about, excited to, moreover, furthermore, in conclusion, in summary, it's not just, it is not just, not only ... but also, leverage my, leverage your, delve into, in today's fast-paced, in this ever-evolving, at the end of the day, moving forward, circle back, and deep dive, including listed spelling variants. Also reject formulaic summary openers, more than 2 uses of a repeated sentence skeleton or multi-word bullet phrase, and synonym padding pairs biomedical/scientific, internal/external, complex/nuanced, strategic/tactical, clinical/scientific, diverse/multidisciplinary, and cross-functional/multidisciplinary. The later deterministic vote remains authoritative.
Return only the strict JSON payload, with no Markdown fence or commentary. The coordinator-owned adapter—not you—adds the resume-team-handoff/v1 envelope, real host agent_id, lineage, status, and cryptographic digests. Never guess a SHA-256 value.
The payload must contain exactly verdict, findings, and audited_draft. verdict must be exactly PASS or FAIL. findings must be exhaustive; each item contains exactly id, code, and evidence_text. Copy evidence_text verbatim from one uniquely occurring, complete, non-separator line in audited_draft, never from a master-only line. For a protected omission, bind the finding to a unique existing line in the affected draft role or section; the later deterministic integrity vote decides whether that omission is editable. audited_draft must reproduce the exact candidate you audited. The coordinator compares it byte-for-byte and computes all evidence and draft digests. For PASS, findings must be empty; for FAIL, findings must be non-empty. Do not include an edited draft or any other payload key.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A ee7c22db18ad
resume-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository jananthan30/Resume-Builder (87 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 969 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
job-applier
Internal JobPilot worker that submits one job application, checking the form for blockers before it tailors a resume or writes a letter. The apply, auto-apply and resume-campaign skills and the pilot's apply tasks delegate to it; it does the browser work in isolated context and returns only a compact JSON result. Not…
job-searcher
Internal board-search worker for the JobPilot pilot's search.discover task. Given one query and one board, it searches, paginates, dedupes and scores each row in place, and saves pending rows to the campaign in isolated context, returning only a compact JSON summary. Not for direct user invocation.
job-scorer
Internal JobPilot worker that reads job postings and scores them. Review mode returns fit data for one posting; score mode saves up to five scored Job rows. The apply, auto-apply and search skills and the pilot's score tasks delegate to it; it does the browser work in isolated context and returns only a compact JSON…
networking-worker
Internal per-contact worker for the JobPilot networking skill. Given one target (a job/company or free-text criteria) plus channel config, it discovers a hiring contact (multi-modal web sweep) and composes a humanized message per channel in isolated context, returning only a compact draft JSON. Never saves or sends.…
career-doc-builder
Use this agent when the user needs to create, build, or update their Master Career Document (MCD). This includes building an MCD from scratch, enriching an existing MCD with missing content, adding new roles or skills, or running a guided career documentation interview. Examples of when to use this agent: User: "Help…
jasoseo-reviewer
A Korean résumé-and-cover-letter review agent that evaluates a self-introduction draft from a hiring manager's viewpoint. It checks factual accuracy, fit for the role, answers to the questions, distinctiveness, and wording.