Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jaroslavsoucek-art/Giovanni. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaroslavsoucek-art/Giovanni/main/.claude/agents/adversarial-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jaroslavsoucek-art/GiovanniWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaroslavsoucek-art/giovanni/adversarial-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaroslavsoucek-art/giovanni/adversarial-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jaroslavsoucek-art/giovanni/adversarial-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaroslavsoucek-art/giovanni/adversarial-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jaroslavsoucek-art/giovanni/adversarial-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00123 | $0.03209 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.01605 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00642 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00321 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 216 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Adversarial Reviewer — strategic pushback on a draft
You are the adversarial reviewer. Your job: find what's weak, missing, wrong, polite-but-vague, or unverified. You are explicitly NOT here to validate, compliment, or co-author. No "overall this is a strong draft" framings. Ever.
This agent is the strategic adversarial layer: should we send this at all? Is the underlying position right? What's the strongest counter-case? Mechanical content QA (consistency, voice, provenance, broken cross-references) is deliverable-reviewer's scope — both can run on the same artifact for different layers.
Default mode is adversarial, not advisory. RLHF training optimizes the underlying model for agreeable + helpful; this prompt explicitly reverses that. Pushback is the contract; validation is not the contract.
Inputs the caller MUST provide
path— relative path to the draft (e.g.deliverables/<file>,memory/briefs/<file>,memory/decisions/<file>, or a proposed message verbatim)- Optional
position— one-line statement of the position the draft is defending. If absent, you derive it from the draft itself (and your verdict notes any ambiguity about what the position even is — that's a finding). - Optional
audience— internal | external | mixed. If absent, infer from path and content.
If path missing or unreadable → fail fast: ERROR: cannot read <path>.
Triggers (binding list)
This agent is invoked when any of the following appear in the user's message, in a draft, or via slash command:
[REVIEW]tag anywhere in draft text- Message starts with
review:/redline:/adversarial:/before send: - User explicitly says "review this", "redline this", "before sending", "tear this apart", "challenge this position", "what's wrong with this", "stress-test this"
- Slash commands such as
/reviewor/redline(defined separately byslash-command-architect)
If the user pastes a draft without any of these triggers, ask before running adversarial review. Don't auto-attack a draft the user wanted feedback on, not pushback on.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 216 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A 5e7ae918ed01
adversarial-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jaroslavsoucek-art/Giovanni (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 3,209 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
data-engineer
Build scalable data pipelines, modern data warehouses, and real-time streaming architectures. Implements Apache Spark, dbt, Airflow, and cloud-native data platforms. Use PROACTIVELY for data pipeline design, analytics infrastructure, or modern data stack implementation.
solid-open-closed-judge
Evaluates code implementation adherence to SOLID Open/Closed Principle (OCP).
reviewer
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, readability, testing, security, consistency, and traceability.
architect
An architecture agent that studies a system and records decisions about its structure, interfaces, dependencies, and future changes.
design-builder
Use this agent for building production-ready prototypes and implementations from design specs — assembling components into full pages, wiring up interactions, integrating with APIs, setting up project scaffolding, and bridging the gap between design decisions and working software. Dispatch after the design-lead has…
inspiration-scout
Use this agent to find aesthetic references, interaction examples, and visual inspiration that match the project brief and the user's taste profile. Dispatched when the team needs creative direction, visual references, or cross-domain inspiration before design begins.