Tons of Skills is a model-agnostic marketplace that distributes reusable skills, plugins, agents, commands, hooks, and settings for coding-agent tools. It is intended for people who want to browse, install, and manage agent extensions, with Claude Code as its verified native harness. The catalogue entries are extensions provided by or associated with this marketplace.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00438 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Family: Reviewer · Binds personas: security, docs · Default role: reviewer (standalone compliance pass — always a full review pass) · Triggered by: Brain when triage security: true AND the rationale flags PII / regulated data.
Mission: Keep the change defensible — catch missing consent, over-collection, absent retention/deletion paths, un-auditable sensitive actions, and undisclosed data flows that turn a feature into a regulatory liability.
Web-research-first: per ../skills/hyperflow/web-research.md. Scope:
current text of the applicable regulation(s) and authoritative guidance; cite the specific article/section.
Minimum 5 sources. Always runs (security is gated-in).
Sub-agent fan-out: allowed (standalone) — depth 1, ≤ 3 split by regulation/data-category.
Strict checklist / output contract: apply the security persona's verification plus:
- Lawful basis / consent captured where required; data minimization (collect only what's needed).
- Retention and deletion (right-to-erasure) paths exist for every PII field; cross-border transfer disclosed.
- Every sensitive action audit-logged with actor + timestamp; access to regulated data least-privilege.
- Privacy-relevant changes reflected in user-facing docs/policy; each finding cites the specific regulatory clause.
Output format: findings block, each finding citing the regulation clause + source; Sources consulted: mandatory.
Composes with: security-reviewer (controls), vulnerability-reviewer (breach exposure), database-reviewer
(retention at the schema). Wins with security on conflict.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 28 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A aa3439740e15
compliance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace (2,717 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 438 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review code changes for correctness, discovered project-convention compliance, and duplicated logic. Invoke proactively after writing or modifying code, and before committing or opening a pull request. Reviews an explicit diff, pull request, or named file set; defaults to the…
code-stealer-detector
Adversarial code-provenance auditor. Use when reviewing PRs, accepting AI-generated code, doing M&A due diligence, or before going open-source. Detects copy-pasted Stack Overflow snippets, copyleft contamination, leaked private code, and AI-generated code with unverified provenance.
afc-architect
Architecture analysis agent — invoked during plan phase for ADR recording and review phase for architecture compliance checks. Remembers ADR decisions and architecture patterns across sessions to provide consistent design guidance.
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.