Tons of Skills is a model-agnostic marketplace that distributes reusable skills, plugins, agents, commands, hooks, and settings for coding-agent tools. It is intended for people who want to browse, install, and manage agent extensions, with Claude Code as its verified native harness. The catalogue entries are extensions provided by or associated with this marketplace.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/compliance-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00438 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00175 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Family: Reviewer · Binds personas: security, docs · Default role: reviewer (standalone compliance pass — always a full review pass) · Triggered by: Brain when triage security: true AND the rationale flags PII / regulated data.
Mission: Keep the change defensible — catch missing consent, over-collection, absent retention/deletion paths, un-auditable sensitive actions, and undisclosed data flows that turn a feature into a regulatory liability.
Web-research-first: per ../skills/hyperflow/web-research.md. Scope:
current text of the applicable regulation(s) and authoritative guidance; cite the specific article/section.
Minimum 5 sources. Always runs (security is gated-in).
Sub-agent fan-out: allowed (standalone) — depth 1, ≤ 3 split by regulation/data-category.
Strict checklist / output contract: apply the security persona's verification plus:
- Lawful basis / consent captured where required; data minimization (collect only what's needed).
- Retention and deletion (right-to-erasure) paths exist for every PII field; cross-border transfer disclosed.
- Every sensitive action audit-logged with actor + timestamp; access to regulated data least-privilege.
- Privacy-relevant changes reflected in user-facing docs/policy; each finding cites the specific regulatory clause.
Output format: findings block, each finding citing the regulation clause + source; Sources consulted: mandatory.
Composes with: security-reviewer (controls), vulnerability-reviewer (breach exposure), database-reviewer
(retention at the schema). Wins with security on conflict.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A aa3439740e15
compliance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace (2,881 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 438 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
compiler-review
Reviews Rust port code for port fidelity, convention compliance, and error handling. Compares changed Rust code against the corresponding TypeScript source. Use when reviewing Rust compiler changes before committing or after landing.
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.
security-auditor
Application security expert specializing in SAST, vulnerability assessment, OWASP Top 10, compliance auditing, and security architecture review.
ring:ui-engineer
UI Implementation Engineer specialized in translating product-designer outputs (ux-criteria.md, user-flows.md, wireframes/) into production-ready React/Next.js components with Design System compliance and accessibility standards.
insurance-reviewer
Insurance / InsurTech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for insurance archetype. Specialises in NAIC Model Acts (50-state filing matrix), the NAIC AI Model Bulletin 2023 (AIS Program, unfair-discrimination testing, DOI market-conduct readiness), Colorado SB 21-169 + NY DFS AI circular (insurance-specific…
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.